IGV vs. XT
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from iShares - IGV tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index while XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGV returned 15.67%/yr vs 14.27%/yr for XT. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.
Performance
IGV vs. XT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -12.27% return, which is significantly lower than XT's 16.76% return. Over the past 10 years, IGV has outperformed XT with an annualized return of 15.67%, while XT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.27% annualized return.
IGV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- 6M
- -11.99%
- YTD
- -12.27%
- 1Y
- -13.74%
- 3Y*
- 8.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.67%
XT
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 12.33%
- YTD
- 16.76%
- 1Y
- 33.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
IGV vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -12.27% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 16.76% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 27.02% | -27.83% | 16.43% | 35.10% | 30.74% | -4.93% | 33.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and XT is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IGV and XT has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IGV vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
XT
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IGV
XT
Communication Services
IGV
XT
Financial Services
IGV
XT
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
XT
Industrials
IGV
XT
Basic Materials
IGV
-
XT
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
XT
Energy
IGV
-
XT
Healthcare
IGV
-
XT
Real Estate
IGV
-
XT
Utilities
IGV
-
XT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
XT
IGV vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGV | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.34 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 3.25 | -3.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 12.61 | -13.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGV vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and XT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -34.41% | -29.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -10.45% | -26.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -22.09% | -14.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | -34.41% | -11.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | -34.41% | -11.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.29% | -3.32% | -17.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.47% | -7.36% | -7.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.66% | 2.69% | +15.97% |
Volatility
IGV vs. XT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a higher volatility of 8.00% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 6.67%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.00% | 6.67% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.33% | 14.11% | +11.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.74% | 17.50% | +11.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.10% | 21.05% | +7.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.41% | 20.09% | +6.32% |
IGV vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. XT - Dividend Comparison
IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than XT's 7.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 7.02% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and XT have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (8.00%) compared to XT (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs XT's -34.41%.
On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 15.67% vs 14.27% for XT. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 6.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 15.67% return vs 14.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.
XT has the higher dividend yield at 7.02%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.
IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.46% for XT.
XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and XT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer