IGV vs. WCLD
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET) and WCLD (WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund) are both Technology Equities funds - IGV tracks the S&P North American Technology-Software Index while WCLD tracks the BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGV returned 6.80%/yr vs -7.67%/yr for WCLD. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGV charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WCLD.
Performance
IGV vs. WCLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly higher than WCLD's -5.51% return.
IGV
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- 13.30%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -6.07%
- 1Y
- -4.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.89%
WCLD
- 1D
- -4.86%
- 1M
- 12.10%
- YTD
- -5.51%
- 6M
- -5.05%
- 1Y
- -9.22%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- -7.67%
- 10Y*
- —
IGV vs. WCLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | -5.19% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 6.65% |
WCLD WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund | -5.51% | -6.69% | 7.35% | 39.35% | -51.64% | -3.21% | 109.71% | 0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and WCLD is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between IGV and WCLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGV vs. WCLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
WCLD
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGV
WCLD
Communication Services
IGV
WCLD
Financial Services
IGV
WCLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
WCLD
-
Industrials
IGV
WCLD
-
Basic Materials
IGV
-
WCLD
-
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
WCLD
-
Energy
IGV
-
WCLD
-
Healthcare
IGV
-
WCLD
Real Estate
IGV
-
WCLD
-
Utilities
IGV
-
WCLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. WCLD — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
WCLD
IGV vs. WCLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) and WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGV | WCLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.98 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | -0.27 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | -0.63 | +0.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGV | WCLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 | -0.26 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | -0.21 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.11 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
IGV vs. WCLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, roughly equal to the maximum WCLD drawdown of -64.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and WCLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | WCLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -64.90% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -34.68% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -42.06% | +5.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | -64.90% | +19.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.93% | -49.36% | +34.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.44% | -35.55% | +21.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.22% | 14.72% | +2.50% |
Volatility
IGV vs. WCLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) is 11.63%, while WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) has a volatility of 16.21%. This indicates that IGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WCLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | WCLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.63% | 16.21% | -4.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.39% | 30.32% | -5.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.61% | 35.01% | -7.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.86% | 37.46% | -9.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.35% | 37.49% | -11.14% |
IGV vs. WCLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than WCLD's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. WCLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGV nor WCLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
WCLD WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and WCLD have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WCLD has higher volatility (16.21%) compared to IGV (11.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs WCLD's -64.90%.
On 5-year performance, IGV leads with 6.80% vs -7.67% for WCLD. On fees, WCLD is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IGV has been the lower-risk option at 11.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IGV has performed better with a 6.80% return vs -7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WCLD is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IGV.
IGV and WCLD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
IGV tracks S&P North American Technology-Software Index, while WCLD tracks BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IGV and 0.45% for WCLD.
IGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and WCLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer