IGV vs. TSXU
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Technology-Software Index, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGV charges 0.46%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
IGV vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
IGV
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- 13.30%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -6.07%
- 1Y
- -4.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.89%
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGV vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | -5.19% | -8.15% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and TSXU is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
TSXU
IGV vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGV | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGV | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 4.53 | -4.17 |
Drawdowns
IGV vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than TSXU's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -35.62% | -27.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.93% | -0.92% | -14.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.44% | -10.56% | -3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.22% | — | — |
Volatility
IGV vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.61% | 78.68% | -51.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.86% | 78.68% | -50.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.35% | 78.68% | -52.33% |
IGV vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
IGV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and TSXU have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGV is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.00% for IGV.
IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. IGV tracks S&P North American Technology-Software Index, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IGV and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for IGV and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer