IGV vs. RIFR
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) and RIFR (Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while RIFR is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by Russell. IGV is passively managed, while RIFR is actively managed. Over the past year, IGV returned -10.30% vs 14.39% for RIFR. Their -0.13 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. IGV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for RIFR.
Performance
IGV vs. RIFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -7.81% return, which is significantly lower than RIFR's 11.66% return.
IGV
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- YTD
- -7.81%
- 1Y
- -10.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.63%
- 10Y*
- 16.04%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.49%
RIFR
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- YTD
- 11.66%
- 1Y
- 14.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.47B | $1.27B | $1.69B | |
| $128.49K | $119.38K | $145.75K |
IGV vs. RIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -7.81% | 0.92% |
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF | 11.66% | 7.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and RIFR is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. RIFR — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
RIFR
IGV vs. RIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGV | RIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.24 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 2.12 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.53 | 6.44 | -6.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGV vs. RIFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than RIFR's maximum drawdown of -6.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and RIFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | RIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -6.80% | -56.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -6.80% | -29.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.28% | -1.50% | -15.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.49% | -1.62% | -12.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.38% | 2.24% | +17.14% |
Volatility
IGV vs. RIFR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR) at 2.53%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | RIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.40% | 2.53% | +4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.09% | 8.92% | +16.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.25% | 10.82% | +18.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.21% | 10.68% | +17.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.47% | 10.68% | +15.79% |
IGV vs. RIFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than RIFR's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. RIFR - Dividend Comparison
IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than RIFR's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF | 0.87% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and RIFR have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to RIFR (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs RIFR's -6.80%.
On 1-year performance, RIFR leads with 14.39% vs -10.30% for IGV. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, RIFR has been the lower-risk option at 2.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RIFR has performed better with a 14.39% return vs -10.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for RIFR.
RIFR has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.
IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while RIFR is Infrastructure Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Russell. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.59% for RIFR.
RIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and RIFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer