PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGV vs. IGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGV vs. IGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 31.32% return. Over the past 10 years, IGV has underperformed IGM with an annualized return of 16.89%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.


IGV

1D
-4.33%
1M
13.30%
YTD
-5.19%
6M
-6.07%
1Y
-4.56%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*
16.89%

IGM

1D
-0.84%
1M
16.93%
YTD
31.32%
6M
29.19%
1Y
62.26%
3Y*
39.18%
5Y*
22.04%
10Y*
25.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGV vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET
-5.19%5.56%23.41%58.56%-35.65%12.30%52.86%34.33%12.44%42.16%
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
31.32%26.76%36.99%60.68%-35.83%25.72%45.11%41.81%2.26%37.20%

Correlation

The correlation between IGV and IGM is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2001

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between IGV and IGM has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IGV vs. IGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IGV
IGM

Technology

89.2%
82.8%

Communication Services

8.6%
16.8%

Financial Services

1.8%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%
0.1%

Industrials

0.2%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

IGV
89.2%
IGM
82.8%

Communication Services

IGV
8.6%
IGM
16.8%

Financial Services

IGV
1.8%
IGM
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IGV
0.3%
IGM
0.1%

Industrials

IGV
0.2%
IGM
0.2%

Basic Materials

IGV

-

IGM

-

Consumer Defensive

IGV

-

IGM

-

Energy

IGV

-

IGM
0.1%

Healthcare

IGV

-

IGM

-

Real Estate

IGV

-

IGM

-

Utilities

IGV

-

IGM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGV vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGV
IGV Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
IGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGV Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

IGM
IGM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGV vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGVIGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.50

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

3.81

-3.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.27

13.36

-13.62

IGV vs. IGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGV Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the IGM Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGV and IGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGVIGMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

3.07

-3.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.86

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

1.03

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.48

-0.12

Drawdowns

IGV vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, roughly equal to the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and IGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGVIGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.45%

-65.59%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.61%

-16.44%

-20.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.61%

-26.39%

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.85%

-40.68%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.85%

-40.68%

-5.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.93%

-0.84%

-14.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.44%

-15.23%

+0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.22%

4.67%

+12.55%

Volatility

IGV vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) has a higher volatility of 11.63% compared to iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) at 6.10%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGVIGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.63%

6.10%

+5.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.39%

16.08%

+8.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.61%

20.43%

+7.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.86%

25.68%

+2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.35%

24.54%

+1.81%

IGV vs. IGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IGV and IGM have an expense ratio of 0.46%.


Dividends

IGV vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison

IGV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
0.12%0.17%0.22%0.33%0.66%0.16%0.32%0.50%0.57%0.57%0.90%0.79%
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.01%0.00%0.35%0.02%0.16%0.09%0.82%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGV and IGM have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGV has higher volatility (11.63%) compared to IGM (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs IGM's -65.59%.

On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 25.19% vs 16.89% for IGV. Both ETFs have the same 0.46% expense ratio. On volatility, IGM has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 16.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGV and IGM have the same expense ratio: 0.46% per year.

IGM has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for IGV.

IGV tracks S&P North American Technology-Software Index, while IGM tracks S&P North American Technology Sector Index.

IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGV and IGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer