IGV vs. FTXL
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGV returned 2.37%/yr vs 33.38%/yr for FTXL. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
IGV vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -17.37% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 111.02% return.
IGV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -7.10%
- YTD
- -17.37%
- 6M
- -19.19%
- 1Y
- -17.89%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
FTXL
- 1D
- -7.99%
- 1M
- 10.24%
- YTD
- 111.02%
- 6M
- 108.37%
- 1Y
- 198.66%
- 3Y*
- 59.97%
- 5Y*
- 33.38%
- 10Y*
- —
IGV vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -17.37% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 111.02% | 48.94% | 7.59% | 54.41% | -33.88% | 36.04% | 46.08% | 61.77% | -14.47% | 32.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and FTXL is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2016 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IGV and FTXL has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IGV vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
FTXL
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGV
FTXL
Communication Services
IGV
FTXL
-
Financial Services
IGV
FTXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
FTXL
-
Industrials
IGV
FTXL
Basic Materials
IGV
-
FTXL
-
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
FTXL
-
Energy
IGV
-
FTXL
-
Healthcare
IGV
-
FTXL
-
Real Estate
IGV
-
FTXL
-
Utilities
IGV
-
FTXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
FTXL
IGV vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGV | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.63 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 13.78 | -14.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 47.69 | -48.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGV vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than FTXL's maximum drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -43.87% | -19.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -14.51% | -22.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -41.57% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | -43.87% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.85% | -7.99% | -17.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.46% | -10.53% | -3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.94% | 4.18% | +13.76% |
Volatility
IGV vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) is 12.71%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 22.71%. This indicates that IGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.71% | 22.71% | -10.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.86% | 34.66% | -9.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.27% | 40.91% | -12.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.97% | 37.11% | -9.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.38% | 34.77% | -8.39% |
IGV vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than FTXL's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.13% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% | 0.00% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and FTXL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXL has higher volatility (22.71%) compared to IGV (12.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs FTXL's -43.87%.
On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 33.38% vs 2.37% for IGV. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGV has been the lower-risk option at 12.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 33.38% return vs 2.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.
IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.89 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer