IGV vs. CSHP
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Technology-Software Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. IGV is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, IGV returned -4.56% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGV charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
IGV vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.63% return.
IGV
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- 13.30%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -6.07%
- 1Y
- -4.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.89%
CSHP
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGV vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | -5.19% | 5.56% | 17.75% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.63% | 4.10% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and CSHP is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024 | 0.04 |
The correlation between IGV and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IGV vs. CSHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
CSHP
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGV
CSHP
-
Communication Services
IGV
CSHP
-
Financial Services
IGV
CSHP
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
CSHP
-
Industrials
IGV
CSHP
-
Basic Materials
IGV
-
CSHP
-
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
CSHP
-
Energy
IGV
-
CSHP
-
Healthcare
IGV
-
CSHP
-
Real Estate
IGV
-
CSHP
-
Utilities
IGV
-
CSHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
CSHP
IGV vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGV | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -12.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -31.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 7.44 | -6.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 65.71 | -65.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 432.16 | -432.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGV | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 | 11.91 | -12.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 10.75 | -10.39 |
Drawdowns
IGV vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -0.08% | -63.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -0.06% | -36.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.93% | 0.00% | -14.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.44% | -0.00% | -14.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.22% | 0.01% | +17.21% |
Volatility
IGV vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) has a higher volatility of 11.63% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.63% | 0.07% | +11.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.39% | 0.24% | +24.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.61% | 0.33% | +27.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.86% | 0.40% | +27.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.35% | 0.40% | +25.95% |
IGV vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
IGV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.92% | 5.39% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and CSHP have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (11.63%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs CSHP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.96% vs -4.56% for IGV. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.96% return vs -4.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IGV.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 0.00% for IGV.
IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IGV and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer