IGV vs. ALAI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) and ALAI (Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. IGV is passively managed, while ALAI is actively managed. Over the past year, IGV returned -14.65% vs 41.75% for ALAI. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ALAI.

Performance

IGV vs. ALAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -11.33% return, which is significantly lower than ALAI's 20.08% return.

IGV

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 2.55%
• 6M: -6.08%
• YTD: -11.33%
• 1Y: -14.65%
• 3Y*: 8.87%
• 5Y*: 3.81%
• 10Y*: 15.79%

ALAI

• 1D: -2.85%
• 1M: -4.98%
• 6M: 16.97%
• YTD: 20.08%
• 1Y: 41.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGV vs. ALAI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF	-11.33%	5.56%	20.22%
ALAI Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF	20.08%	39.81%	32.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IGV and ALAI is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2024	0.67

The correlation between IGV and ALAI shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IGV vs. ALAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IGV	ALAI
Technology	89.1%	54.7%
Communication Services	8.6%	21.1%
Financial Services	1.9%	4.0%
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	12.7%
Industrials	0.1%	2.2%
Basic Materials	-	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	2.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	2.8%

Return for Risk

IGV vs. ALAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGV

IGV Risk / Return Rank: 5
IGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
IGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
IGV Omega Ratio Rank: 5
IGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
IGV Martin Ratio Rank: 6

ALAI

ALAI Risk / Return Rank: 53
ALAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ALAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
ALAI Omega Ratio Rank: 52
ALAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
ALAI Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGV vs. ALAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IGV	ALAI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	1.58	-2.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.56	2.13	-2.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.26	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.40	2.15	-2.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.78	6.63	-7.41

IGV vs. ALAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGV Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the ALAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGV and ALAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IGV vs. ALAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than ALAI's maximum drawdown of -29.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and ALAI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGV	ALAI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.45%	-29.36%	-34.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.61%	-19.48%	-17.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.44%	-7.25%	-13.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.48%	-5.11%	-9.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.79%	6.31%	+12.48%

Volatility

IGV vs. ALAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) is 7.72%, while Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI) has a volatility of 8.63%. This indicates that IGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGV	ALAI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.72%	8.63%	-0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.28%	21.49%	+3.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.66%	26.60%	+2.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.09%	28.88%	-0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.40%	28.88%	-2.48%

IGV vs. ALAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ALAI's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGV vs. ALAI - Dividend Comparison

IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than ALAI's 1.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALAI Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF	1.25%	1.50%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.01%	0.00%	0.35%	0.02%	0.16%	0.09%	0.82%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGV and ALAI in my portfolio?

IGV and ALAI have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGV or ALAI?

ALAI has higher volatility (8.63%) compared to IGV (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs ALAI's -29.36%.

Which ETF is better, IGV or ALAI?

On 1-year performance, ALAI leads with 41.75% vs -14.65% for IGV. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGV has been the lower-risk option at 7.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IGV or ALAI?

Over the 1-year period, ALAI has performed better with a 41.75% return vs -14.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGV or ALAI?

IGV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ALAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGV or ALAI?

ALAI has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.

What is the main difference between IGV and ALAI?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Alger. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.55% for ALAI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.