IGPT vs. NBDS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IGPT (Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF) and NBDS (Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. IGPT is passively managed, while NBDS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGPT returned 43.05%/yr vs 23.07%/yr for NBDS. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGPT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for NBDS.

Performance

IGPT vs. NBDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGPT achieves a 72.49% return, which is significantly higher than NBDS's 17.73% return.

IGPT

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 28.39%
• YTD: 72.49%
• 6M: 75.56%
• 1Y: 123.95%
• 3Y*: 43.05%
• 5Y*: 15.89%
• 10Y*: 22.30%

NBDS

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 16.39%
• YTD: 17.73%
• 6M: 15.50%
• 1Y: 33.80%
• 3Y*: 23.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGPT vs. NBDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF	72.49%	31.55%	17.15%	27.29%	-15.49%
NBDS Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF	17.73%	19.58%	17.97%	38.55%	-24.65%

Correlation

The correlation between IGPT and NBDS is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2022	0.89

The correlation between IGPT and NBDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGPT vs. NBDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IGPT	NBDS
Technology	73.9%	65.4%
Communication Services	15.6%	4.4%
Real Estate	3.9%	-
Healthcare	3.6%	9.1%
Industrials	3.1%	5.8%
Financial Services	1.3%	5.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	3.1%

Return for Risk

IGPT vs. NBDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGPT

IGPT Risk / Return Rank: 94
IGPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
IGPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
IGPT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
IGPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
IGPT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

NBDS

NBDS Risk / Return Rank: 34
NBDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
NBDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
NBDS Omega Ratio Rank: 38
NBDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
NBDS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGPT vs. NBDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IGPT	NBDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.39	1.38	+3.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.95	1.90	+3.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.67	1.24	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.47	1.42	+6.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	29.16	3.71	+25.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGPT vs. NBDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGPT Sharpe Ratio is 4.39, which is higher than the NBDS Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGPT and NBDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IGPT	NBDS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.39	1.38	+3.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.52	+0.12

Drawdowns

IGPT vs. NBDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGPT drawdown since its inception was -50.14%, which is greater than NBDS's maximum drawdown of -29.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGPT and NBDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGPT	NBDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.14%	-29.81%	-20.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.68%	-23.96%	+7.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.30%	-28.51%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.69%	+0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.96%	-9.52%	-2.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.27%	9.13%	-4.86%

Volatility

IGPT vs. NBDS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) has a higher volatility of 12.51% compared to Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) at 8.88%. This indicates that IGPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGPT	NBDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.51%	8.88%	+3.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.50%	19.41%	+4.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.42%	24.54%	+3.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.66%	27.64%	+0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.33%	27.64%	-1.31%

IGPT vs. NBDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGPT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than NBDS's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGPT vs. NBDS - Dividend Comparison

IGPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than NBDS's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF	0.03%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	1.41%	6.21%	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.15%
NBDS Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF	0.32%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGPT and NBDS in my portfolio?

IGPT and NBDS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGPT or NBDS?

IGPT has higher volatility (12.51%) compared to NBDS (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGPT dropped -50.14% vs NBDS's -29.81%.

Which ETF is better, IGPT or NBDS?

On 3-year performance, IGPT leads with 43.05% vs 23.07% for NBDS. On fees, NBDS is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, NBDS has been the lower-risk option at 8.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IGPT or NBDS?

Over the 3-year period, IGPT has performed better with a 43.05% return vs 23.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGPT or NBDS?

NBDS is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IGPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGPT or NBDS?

NBDS has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.03% for IGPT.

What is the main difference between IGPT and NBDS?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Neuberger Berman. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IGPT and 0.55% for NBDS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.39 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.