PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGPT vs. ASMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IGPT vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IGPT vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
-2.36%53.67%
ASMH
ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF
25.77%58.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGPT achieves a -2.36% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 25.77% return.


IGPT

1D
4.64%
1M
-8.95%
YTD
-2.36%
6M
7.47%
1Y
43.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
16.03%

ASMH

1D
4.15%
1M
-6.47%
YTD
25.77%
6M
39.55%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IGPT vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGPT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IGPT vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGPT
IGPT Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IGPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGPT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IGPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGPT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ASMH
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGPT vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGPTASMHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.39

IGPT vs. ASMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGPTASMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

3.00

-2.48

Correlation

The correlation between IGPT and ASMH is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IGPT vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

IGPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than ASMH's 1.29% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
0.05%0.04%0.00%0.00%1.41%6.21%0.04%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.15%
ASMH
ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF
1.29%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IGPT vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGPT drawdown since its inception was -50.14%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGPT and ASMH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IGPTASMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.14%

-15.89%

-34.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.82%

-11.21%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.05%

-4.43%

-7.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.54%

Volatility

IGPT vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IGPTASMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.39%

36.81%

-6.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.90%

36.81%

-9.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.83%

36.81%

-10.98%