IGOV vs. KBND

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IGOV (iShares International Treasury Bond ETF) and KBND (KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF) are both International Government Bonds funds - IGOV tracks the FTSE World Government Bond Index - Developed Markets Capped Select Index while KBND tracks the KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGOV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KBND.

Performance

IGOV vs. KBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Treasury Bond ETF (IGOV) and KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IGOV

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -1.26%
• YTD: -1.80%
• 6M: -2.15%
• 1Y: -2.13%
• 3Y*: 1.73%
• 5Y*: -4.43%
• 10Y*: -1.49%

KBND

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGOV vs. KBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IGOV iShares International Treasury Bond ETF	-1.80%	9.96%	-6.50%	5.57%	-22.07%	-9.25%	10.88%	3.76%	-2.60%	11.38%
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.89%	3.13%	-6.81%	4.41%	9.38%	1.25%	-0.09%	9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between IGOV and KBND is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2014	0.15

Return for Risk

IGOV vs. KBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGOV

IGOV Risk / Return Rank: 6
IGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
IGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
IGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6
IGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
IGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 5

KBND

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGOV vs. KBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Treasury Bond ETF (IGOV) and KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IGOV	KBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.32	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.38	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.83	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IGOV	KBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.05%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IGOV	KBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.29%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.37%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.13%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.97%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.60%	—	—

IGOV vs. KBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGOV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KBND's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGOV vs. KBND - Dividend Comparison

IGOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, while KBND has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGOV iShares International Treasury Bond ETF	1.43%	1.41%	0.59%	0.00%	0.11%	0.39%	0.00%	0.24%	0.31%	0.19%	0.69%	0.12%
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.40%	2.20%	2.51%	6.97%	2.27%	3.47%	4.98%	0.00%	0.04%	1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGOV and KBND in my portfolio?

IGOV and KBND have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IGOV or KBND?

On fees, IGOV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGOV or KBND?

IGOV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGOV or KBND?

IGOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for KBND.

What is the main difference between IGOV and KBND?

IGOV tracks FTSE World Government Bond Index - Developed Markets Capped Select Index, while KBND tracks KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IGOV and 0.50% for KBND.