IGM vs. XOMO
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) and XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while XOMO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. IGM is passively managed, while XOMO is actively managed. Over the past year, IGM returned 38.56% vs 29.81% for XOMO. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. IGM charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for XOMO.
Performance
IGM vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 21.55% return, which is significantly higher than XOMO's 20.15% return.
IGM
- 1D
- 2.20%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 20.71%
- YTD
- 21.55%
- 1Y
- 38.56%
- 3Y*
- 33.72%
- 5Y*
- 18.11%
- 10Y*
- 23.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.48%
XOMO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- YTD
- 20.15%
- 1Y
- 29.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $47.27M | $46.48M | $81.75M | |
| $559.24K | $694.66K | $715.05K |
IGM vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 21.55% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 11.08% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 20.15% | 6.90% | 6.11% | -8.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and XOMO is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023 | -0.07 |
The correlation between IGM and XOMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
XOMO
IGM vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGM | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.26 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 1.74 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.77 | 4.35 | +2.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGM vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and XOMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -18.90% | -46.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -17.25% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.21% | -7.65% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.18% | -7.50% | -7.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.71% | 6.89% | -1.18% |
Volatility
IGM vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a higher volatility of 8.47% compared to YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) at 6.21%. This indicates that IGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.47% | 6.21% | +2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.36% | 17.24% | +3.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.40% | 20.67% | +3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.36% | 19.19% | +7.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.85% | 19.19% | +5.66% |
IGM vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGM vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than XOMO's 37.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 37.07% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGM and XOMO have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGM has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to XOMO (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs XOMO's -18.90%.
On 1-year performance, IGM leads with 38.56% vs 29.81% for XOMO. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, XOMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IGM has performed better with a 38.56% return vs 29.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.
XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 37.07%, compared with 0.14% for IGM.
IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while XOMO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGM and 1.01% for XOMO.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGM and XOMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer