IGM vs. VUG
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGM returned 25.12%/yr vs 18.30%/yr for VUG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
IGM vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 27.92% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 7.94% return. Over the past 10 years, IGM has outperformed VUG with an annualized return of 25.12%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively lower 18.30% annualized return.
IGM
- 1D
- 3.64%
- 1M
- 7.10%
- YTD
- 27.92%
- 6M
- 29.29%
- 1Y
- 56.16%
- 3Y*
- 36.48%
- 5Y*
- 20.96%
- 10Y*
- 25.12%
VUG
- 1D
- 2.81%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 26.29%
- 3Y*
- 24.04%
- 5Y*
- 14.43%
- 10Y*
- 18.30%
IGM vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 27.92% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 7.94% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and VUG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.93 |
The correlation between IGM and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGM vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGM
VUG
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IGM
VUG
Communication Services
IGM
VUG
Industrials
IGM
VUG
Financial Services
IGM
VUG
Energy
IGM
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
IGM
VUG
Basic Materials
IGM
-
VUG
Consumer Defensive
IGM
-
VUG
Healthcare
IGM
-
VUG
Real Estate
IGM
-
VUG
Utilities
IGM
-
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
VUG
IGM vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGM | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.28 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 1.60 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.62 | 5.50 | +6.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGM vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -50.68% | -14.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -16.53% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -22.85% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | -35.61% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | -35.61% | -5.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.41% | -2.90% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -7.09% | -8.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.85% | 4.79% | +0.06% |
Volatility
IGM vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a higher volatility of 10.54% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 6.32%. This indicates that IGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.54% | 6.32% | +4.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.42% | 13.28% | +5.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.24% | 16.65% | +5.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.97% | 22.34% | +3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.70% | 21.51% | +3.19% |
IGM vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGM vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than VUG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.17% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, IGM and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IGM has higher volatility (10.54%) compared to VUG (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 25.12% vs 18.30% for VUG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 6.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 25.12% return vs 18.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGM.
VUG has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.17% for IGM.
IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGM and 0.03% for VUG.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGM and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer