PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGM vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGM vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 19.28% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 4.93% return. Over the past 10 years, IGM has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 23.53%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 18.26% annualized return.


IGM

1D
0.42%
1M
-6.48%
6M
18.02%
YTD
19.28%
1Y
34.76%
3Y*
32.52%
5Y*
17.93%
10Y*
23.53%
ALL TIME*
12.42%

SCHG

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.84%
6M
5.77%
YTD
4.93%
1Y
15.31%
3Y*
21.96%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*
18.26%
ALL TIME*
16.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGM vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
19.28%26.76%36.99%60.68%-35.83%25.72%45.11%41.81%2.26%37.20%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
4.93%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IGM and SCHG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.94

The correlation between IGM and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGM vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IGM
SCHG

Technology

84.5%
44.0%

Communication Services

14.9%
14.1%

Industrials

0.2%
7.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
7.7%

Energy

0.0%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
11.2%

Basic Materials

0.0%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.9%

Healthcare

-

9.9%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

0.5%

Technology

IGM
84.5%
SCHG
44.0%

Communication Services

IGM
14.9%
SCHG
14.1%

Industrials

IGM
0.2%
SCHG
7.6%

Financial Services

IGM
0.2%
SCHG
7.7%

Energy

IGM
0.0%
SCHG
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IGM
0.0%
SCHG
11.2%

Basic Materials

IGM
0.0%
SCHG
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

IGM

-

SCHG
1.9%

Healthcare

IGM

-

SCHG
9.9%

Real Estate

IGM

-

SCHG
0.6%

Utilities

IGM

-

SCHG
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGM vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGM
IGM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGM vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGMSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.17

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

0.94

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.57

3.00

+3.57

IGM vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGM Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGM and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGM vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGMSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.59%

-34.59%

-31.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.44%

-16.41%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-23.39%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.68%

-34.59%

-6.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.68%

-34.59%

-6.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.93%

-3.16%

-6.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.19%

-5.19%

-10.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

5.12%

+0.18%

Volatility

IGM vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a higher volatility of 8.68% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.47%. This indicates that IGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGMSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.68%

4.47%

+4.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.74%

12.82%

+6.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.66%

16.43%

+7.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.23%

22.40%

+3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.77%

21.57%

+3.20%

IGM vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGM vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than SCHG's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
0.14%0.17%0.22%0.33%0.66%0.16%0.32%0.50%0.57%0.57%0.90%0.79%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.39%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGM and SCHG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGM has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to SCHG (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 23.53% vs 18.26% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 23.53% return vs 18.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGM.

SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.14% for IGM.

IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGM and 0.04% for SCHG.

IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGM and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer