PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGM vs. MGK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGM vs. MGK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly higher than MGK's 10.01% return. Over the past 10 years, IGM has outperformed MGK with an annualized return of 25.19%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively lower 19.24% annualized return.


IGM

1D
-0.84%
1M
16.93%
YTD
31.32%
6M
29.19%
1Y
62.26%
3Y*
39.18%
5Y*
22.04%
10Y*
25.19%

MGK

1D
-1.13%
1M
7.26%
YTD
10.01%
6M
9.45%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
26.77%
5Y*
16.25%
10Y*
19.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGM vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
31.32%26.76%36.99%60.68%-35.83%25.72%45.11%41.81%2.26%37.20%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
10.01%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%37.38%-2.91%29.49%

Correlation

The correlation between IGM and MGK is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007

0.95

The correlation between IGM and MGK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGM vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IGM
MGK

Technology

82.8%
56.1%

Communication Services

16.8%
17.3%

Financial Services

0.2%
4.5%

Industrials

0.2%
1.1%

Energy

0.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
12.8%

Basic Materials

-

0.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.4%

Healthcare

-

4.5%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Technology

IGM
82.8%
MGK
56.1%

Communication Services

IGM
16.8%
MGK
17.3%

Financial Services

IGM
0.2%
MGK
4.5%

Industrials

IGM
0.2%
MGK
1.1%

Energy

IGM
0.1%
MGK

-

Consumer Cyclical

IGM
0.1%
MGK
12.8%

Basic Materials

IGM

-

MGK
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

IGM

-

MGK
0.4%

Healthcare

IGM

-

MGK
4.5%

Real Estate

IGM

-

MGK
1.3%

Utilities

IGM

-

MGK
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGM vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGM
IGM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGM vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGMMGKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.07

1.86

+1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.78

2.53

+1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.32

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

1.79

+2.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.36

6.15

+7.20

IGM vs. MGK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGM Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the MGK Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGM and MGK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGMMGKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07

1.86

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.72

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

0.88

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.66

-0.17

Drawdowns

IGM vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than MGK's maximum drawdown of -47.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and MGK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGMMGKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.59%

-47.97%

-17.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.44%

-16.85%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-23.36%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.68%

-36.01%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.68%

-36.01%

-4.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-1.43%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.23%

-7.47%

-7.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

4.89%

-0.22%

Volatility

IGM vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison

iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) at 4.01%. This indicates that IGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGMMGKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

4.01%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.08%

12.37%

+3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.43%

16.23%

+4.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.68%

22.63%

+3.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.54%

21.88%

+2.66%

IGM vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGM has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGM vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison

IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than MGK's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
0.12%0.17%0.22%0.33%0.66%0.16%0.32%0.50%0.57%0.57%0.90%0.79%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.32%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IGM and MGK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IGM has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to MGK (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs MGK's -47.97%.

On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 25.19% vs 19.24% for MGK. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 19.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IGM.

MGK has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.12% for IGM.

IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while MGK is Large Cap Growth Equities. IGM tracks S&P North American Technology Sector Index, while MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IGM and 0.05% for MGK.

IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGM and MGK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer