IGM vs. MGK
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) and MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Technology Sector Index, while MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGM returned 25.19%/yr vs 19.24%/yr for MGK. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGM charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGK.
Performance
IGM vs. MGK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly higher than MGK's 10.01% return. Over the past 10 years, IGM has outperformed MGK with an annualized return of 25.19%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively lower 19.24% annualized return.
IGM
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 16.93%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 62.26%
- 3Y*
- 39.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.04%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
MGK
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 7.26%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 30.01%
- 3Y*
- 26.77%
- 5Y*
- 16.25%
- 10Y*
- 19.24%
IGM vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 31.32% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 10.01% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -2.91% | 29.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and MGK is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007 | 0.95 |
The correlation between IGM and MGK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGM vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGM
MGK
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IGM
MGK
Communication Services
IGM
MGK
Financial Services
IGM
MGK
Industrials
IGM
MGK
Energy
IGM
MGK
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGM
MGK
Basic Materials
IGM
-
MGK
Consumer Defensive
IGM
-
MGK
Healthcare
IGM
-
MGK
Real Estate
IGM
-
MGK
Utilities
IGM
-
MGK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
MGK
IGM vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGM | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.07 | 1.86 | +1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.78 | 2.53 | +1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.32 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 1.79 | +2.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | 6.15 | +7.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGM | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07 | 1.86 | +1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.72 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | 0.88 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.66 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
IGM vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than MGK's maximum drawdown of -47.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and MGK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -47.97% | -17.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -16.85% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -23.36% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | -36.01% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | -36.01% | -4.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -1.43% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.23% | -7.47% | -7.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 4.89% | -0.22% |
Volatility
IGM vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) at 4.01%. This indicates that IGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 4.01% | +2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.08% | 12.37% | +3.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.43% | 16.23% | +4.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.68% | 22.63% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.54% | 21.88% | +2.66% |
IGM vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGM has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGM vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than MGK's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.32% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, IGM and MGK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IGM has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to MGK (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs MGK's -47.97%.
On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 25.19% vs 19.24% for MGK. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 19.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IGM.
MGK has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.12% for IGM.
IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while MGK is Large Cap Growth Equities. IGM tracks S&P North American Technology Sector Index, while MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IGM and 0.05% for MGK.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGM and MGK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer