IGLT.L vs. EIMI.L
IGLT.L (iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF) and EIMI.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGLT.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks Index, while EIMI.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGLT.L returned -0.90%/yr vs 11.09%/yr for EIMI.L. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. IGLT.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EIMI.L.
Performance
IGLT.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGLT.L is traded in GBP, while EIMI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EIMI.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLT.L achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than EIMI.L's 24.75% return. Over the past 10 years, IGLT.L has underperformed EIMI.L with an annualized return of -0.90%, while EIMI.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.09% annualized return.
IGLT.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- -0.84%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 2.10%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- -4.26%
- 10Y*
- -0.90%
EIMI.L
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 24.75%
- 6M
- 26.33%
- 1Y
- 50.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
IGLT.L vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLT.L iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF | -0.84% | 4.69% | -3.33% | 3.56% | -23.71% | -5.03% | 8.08% | 6.70% | 0.53% | 1.39% |
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 24.75% | 22.75% | 9.23% | 5.48% | -10.12% | 0.29% | 15.31% | 11.94% | -9.08% | 25.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLT.L and EIMI.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2014 | -0.03 |
The correlation between IGLT.L and EIMI.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLT.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGLT.L
EIMI.L
IGLT.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGLT.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.53 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 4.78 | -4.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.07 | 16.25 | -15.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGLT.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 2.83 | -2.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 | 0.53 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | 0.60 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.47 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
IGLT.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLT.L drawdown since its inception was -35.52%, which is greater than EIMI.L's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLT.L and EIMI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLT.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.52% | -31.70% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.24% | -10.58% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.97% | -15.79% | +8.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.49% | -22.27% | -11.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.52% | -26.10% | -9.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.96% | -2.29% | -23.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -8.72% | +0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 3.12% | -1.15% |
Volatility
IGLT.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L) is 2.31%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 7.58%. This indicates that IGLT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLT.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 7.58% | -5.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.73% | 15.58% | -10.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.00% | 17.91% | -11.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.02% | 16.61% | -6.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.02% | 18.39% | -9.37% |
IGLT.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLT.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IGLT.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison
IGLT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, while EIMI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGLT.L iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF | 4.50% | 4.26% | 3.69% | 2.40% | 1.32% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 1.25% | 1.31% | 1.30% | 1.88% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGLT.L and EIMI.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGLT.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGLT.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EIMI.L.
IGLT.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while EIMI.L is Emerging Markets Equities. IGLT.L tracks FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks Index, while EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IGLT.L and 0.18% for EIMI.L.
Find the right allocation for IGLT.L and EIMI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer