IGLT.L vs. GLT5.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L) and Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L).
IGLT.L and GLT5.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGLT.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. GLT5.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. It was launched on Mar 18, 2019. Both IGLT.L and GLT5.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IGLT.L or GLT5.L.
Key characteristics
| IGLT.L | GLT5.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.94% | 1.29% |
| 1Y Return | 3.43% | 3.85% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -8.60% | -0.30% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -4.86% | -0.15% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.35 | 1.35 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.55 | 1.94 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.06 | 1.24 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.08 | 0.56 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.82 | 5.48 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.13% | 0.63% |
| Daily Std Dev | 7.43% | 2.56% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.52% | -10.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -28.39% | -2.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLT.L and GLT5.L is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IGLT.L vs. GLT5.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IGLT.L achieves a -2.94% return, which is significantly lower than GLT5.L's 1.29% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGLT.L vs. GLT5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLT.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than GLT5.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IGLT.L vs. GLT5.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L) and Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IGLT.L vs. GLT5.L - Dividend Comparison
IGLT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than GLT5.L's 4.47% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLT.L iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF | 3.02% | 2.40% | 1.32% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 1.25% | 1.31% | 1.30% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 2.04% | 2.14% |
GLT5.L Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist | 4.47% | 3.76% | 1.01% | 0.19% | 0.33% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IGLT.L vs. GLT5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLT.L drawdown since its inception was -35.52%, which is greater than GLT5.L's maximum drawdown of -10.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLT.L and GLT5.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IGLT.L vs. GLT5.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L) at 2.46%. This indicates that IGLT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLT5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.