IGF vs. RIFR
IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) and RIFR (Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds. IGF is passively managed, while RIFR is actively managed. Over the past year, IGF returned 17.62% vs 15.06% for RIFR. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGF charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for RIFR.
Performance
IGF vs. RIFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly lower than RIFR's 10.16% return.
IGF
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 9.67%
- 6M
- 8.98%
- 1Y
- 17.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.70%
- 10Y*
- 8.79%
RIFR
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 15.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGF vs. RIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 9.67% | 10.99% |
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF | 10.16% | 7.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGF and RIFR is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.82 |
The correlation between IGF and RIFR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGF vs. RIFR — Risk / Return Rank
IGF
RIFR
IGF vs. RIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGF | RIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.25 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 2.22 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.52 | 6.82 | +1.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGF vs. RIFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than RIFR's maximum drawdown of -6.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and RIFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGF | RIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.33% | -6.80% | -51.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.87% | -6.80% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.99% | -2.82% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.84% | -1.66% | -10.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 2.21% | -0.14% |
Volatility
IGF vs. RIFR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR) have volatilities of 3.35% and 3.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGF | RIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | 3.31% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.73% | 8.69% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.56% | 10.64% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.96% | 10.67% | +3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 10.67% | +6.06% |
IGF vs. RIFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than RIFR's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGF vs. RIFR - Dividend Comparison
IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than RIFR's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.91% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF | 0.89% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGF and RIFR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGF has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to RIFR (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGF dropped -58.33% vs RIFR's -6.80%.
On 1-year performance, IGF leads with 17.62% vs 15.06% for RIFR. On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IGF has performed better with a 17.62% return vs 15.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for RIFR.
IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 0.89% for RIFR.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Russell. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGF and 0.59% for RIFR.
IGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGF and RIFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer