IGF vs. GGINX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX).
IGF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2007. GGINX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jun 26, 2016.
Performance
IGF vs. GGINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IGF vs. GGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 9.19% | 21.31% | 14.81% | 6.14% | -1.26% | 11.57% | -6.50% | 25.82% | -9.95% | 18.85% |
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund | 10.48% | 15.18% | 28.43% | 5.00% | -8.51% | 16.49% | -3.81% | 31.50% | -8.99% | 11.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly lower than GGINX's 10.48% return.
IGF
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 6M
- 11.40%
- 1Y
- 26.64%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
GGINX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -3.88%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 6M
- 11.37%
- 1Y
- 18.80%
- 3Y*
- 18.89%
- 5Y*
- 12.04%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGF vs. GGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GGINX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IGF vs. GGINX — Risk / Return Rank
IGF
GGINX
IGF vs. GGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGF | GGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 1.51 | +0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.77 | 1.98 | +0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.29 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 2.27 | +0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.62 | 10.44 | +5.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGF | GGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 1.51 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.62 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.51 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between IGF and GGINX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IGF vs. GGINX - Dividend Comparison
IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than GGINX's 6.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.95% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund | 6.07% | 6.26% | 30.25% | 2.67% | 0.89% | 1.86% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.98% | 2.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IGF vs. GGINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than GGINX's maximum drawdown of -35.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and GGINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGF | GGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.33% | -35.80% | -22.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.74% | -8.55% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.83% | -24.21% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -3.94% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.96% | -5.97% | -5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 1.86% | -0.12% |
Volatility
IGF vs. GGINX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) at 3.67%. This indicates that IGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IGF | GGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 3.67% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.33% | 7.34% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 12.83% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 19.61% | -5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 19.09% | -2.28% |