GGINX vs. CSUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX).
GGINX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jun 26, 2016. CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004.
Performance
GGINX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GGINX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund | 10.48% | 15.18% | 28.43% | 5.00% | -8.51% | 16.49% | -3.81% | 31.50% | -8.99% | 11.75% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGINX achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly higher than CSUIX's 8.44% return.
GGINX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -3.88%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 6M
- 11.37%
- 1Y
- 18.80%
- 3Y*
- 18.89%
- 5Y*
- 12.04%
- 10Y*
- —
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GGINX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGINX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GGINX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
GGINX
CSUIX
GGINX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGINX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 1.67 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | 2.21 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.33 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 2.42 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.44 | 10.58 | -0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGINX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 1.67 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.64 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.58 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between GGINX and CSUIX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GGINX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
GGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, less than CSUIX's 7.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund | 6.07% | 6.26% | 30.25% | 2.67% | 0.89% | 1.86% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.98% | 2.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
GGINX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGINX drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGINX and CSUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGINX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.80% | -52.01% | +16.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | -7.99% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.21% | -20.01% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.94% | -4.36% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -8.21% | +2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 1.82% | +0.04% |
Volatility
GGINX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.24%. This indicates that GGINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GGINX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 3.24% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.34% | 6.90% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.83% | 11.49% | +1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 12.86% | +6.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 14.88% | +4.21% |