PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IG vs. PCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IG vs. PCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IG

1D
0.25%
1M
1.18%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PCL

1D
0.25%
1M
2.27%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IG vs. PCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IG and PCL is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IG vs. PCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IG vs. PCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IG vs. PCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IG drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, smaller than the maximum PCL drawdown of -5.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IG and PCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGPCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-5.14%

+3.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.68%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.45%

-1.73%

+1.28%

Volatility

IG vs. PCL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGPCLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.86%

7.85%

-2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.86%

7.85%

-2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.86%

7.85%

-2.99%

IG vs. PCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IG has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than PCL's 0.25% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IG vs. PCL - Dividend Comparison

IG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than PCL's 5.26% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IG and PCL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PCL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PCL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for IG.

PCL has the higher dividend yield at 5.26%, compared with 0.84% for IG.

They also come from different issuers: Principal and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for IG and 0.25% for PCL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IG and PCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer