IG vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

IG (Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - IG is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Principal, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. IG is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.75, they often move in opposite directions. IG charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

IG vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IG

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -7.65%
• YTD: 86.76%
• 6M: 83.45%
• 1Y: 89.50%
• 3Y*: 27.10%
• 5Y*: 23.77%
• 10Y*: 13.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IG vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IG Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF	0.01%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	4.67%

Correlation

The correlation between IG and BNO is -0.75, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026	-0.75

Return for Risk

IG vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IG vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IG	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	0.14	-0.12

Drawdowns

IG vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IG drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IG and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	IG	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-87.06%	+85.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.87%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-12.04%	+11.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.54%	-40.18%	+39.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.43%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IG	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	15.03%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.08%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.94%	41.56%	-36.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.94%	35.37%	-30.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.94%	36.68%	-31.74%

IG vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IG has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

IG vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

IG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%
IG Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IG and BNO in my portfolio?

IG and BNO have a correlation of -0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IG or BNO?

On fees, IG is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IG or BNO?

IG is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IG or BNO?

IG has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between IG and BNO?

IG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for IG and 0.90% for BNO.