IFRA vs. BOTZ

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

IFRA (iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFRA is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IFRA returned 13.63%/yr vs 2.06%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFRA charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.

Performance

IFRA vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFRA achieves a 19.01% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 5.58% return.

IFRA

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 2.86%
• YTD: 19.01%
• 6M: 17.73%
• 1Y: 31.64%
• 3Y*: 19.65%
• 5Y*: 13.63%
• 10Y*: —

BOTZ

• 1D: 3.04%
• 1M: -4.92%
• YTD: 5.58%
• 6M: 6.30%
• 1Y: 24.59%
• 3Y*: 9.30%
• 5Y*: 2.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFRA vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF	19.01%	15.90%	17.02%	13.42%	-3.32%	29.81%	7.37%	27.00%	-7.97%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	5.58%	14.17%	12.26%	38.97%	-42.69%	8.65%	51.92%	31.80%	-27.36%

Correlation

The correlation between IFRA and BOTZ is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018	0.61

The correlation between IFRA and BOTZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IFRA vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IFRA	BOTZ
Industrials	39.4%	49.3%
Utilities	37.7%	0.0%
Basic Materials	14.7%	0.0%
Energy	7.9%	0.5%
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	6.4%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	0.0%
Communication Services	-	4.4%
Financial Services	-	0.9%
Healthcare	-	8.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	31.8%

Return for Risk

IFRA vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFRA

IFRA Risk / Return Rank: 75
IFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
IFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
IFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 65
IFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
IFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 79

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 30
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFRA vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IFRA	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	0.98	+1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	1.51	+1.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.18	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.78	1.28	+2.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.85	4.20	+9.65

IFRA vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFRA Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFRA and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IFRA vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFRA drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFRA and BOTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IFRA	BOTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.06%	-55.54%	+14.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.40%	-19.34%	+10.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.93%	-29.02%	+9.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.93%	-55.54%	+35.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-8.12%	+7.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.13%	-18.28%	+13.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.29%	5.86%	-3.57%

Volatility

IFRA vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) is 5.33%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 9.53%. This indicates that IFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IFRA	BOTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.33%	9.53%	-4.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.64%	19.72%	-8.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.11%	25.24%	-10.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.98%	26.95%	-8.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.37%	25.81%	-4.44%

IFRA vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFRA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

IFRA vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

IFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than BOTZ's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.62%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF	1.86%	1.84%	1.75%	1.98%	1.98%	1.63%	2.08%	1.68%	2.50%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IFRA and BOTZ in my portfolio?

IFRA and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IFRA or BOTZ?

BOTZ has higher volatility (9.53%) compared to IFRA (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFRA dropped -41.06% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

Which ETF is better, IFRA or BOTZ?

On 5-year performance, IFRA leads with 13.63% vs 2.06% for BOTZ. On fees, IFRA is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, IFRA has been the lower-risk option at 5.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IFRA or BOTZ?

Over the 5-year period, IFRA has performed better with a 13.63% return vs 2.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IFRA or BOTZ?

IFRA is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IFRA or BOTZ?

IFRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.62% for BOTZ.

What is the main difference between IFRA and BOTZ?

IFRA is categorized as Industrials Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. IFRA tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IFRA and 0.68% for BOTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IFRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.