IFN vs. URA
IFN (The India Fund) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both funds - IFN is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by India Fund, while URA is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. Over the past 10 years, IFN returned 5.99%/yr vs 17.12%/yr for URA. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IFN charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.
Performance
IFN vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFN achieves a -15.46% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 17.93% return. Over the past 10 years, IFN has underperformed URA with an annualized return of 5.99%, while URA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.12% annualized return.
IFN
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -5.23%
- YTD
- -15.46%
- 6M
- -17.27%
- 1Y
- -22.15%
- 3Y*
- 0.84%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 5.99%
URA
- 1D
- -5.67%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- YTD
- 17.93%
- 6M
- 13.25%
- 1Y
- 61.26%
- 3Y*
- 39.27%
- 5Y*
- 21.39%
- 10Y*
- 17.12%
IFN vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFN The India Fund | -15.46% | 0.42% | -2.26% | 36.48% | -15.85% | 22.31% | 12.25% | 11.27% | -5.33% | 37.15% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 17.93% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 57.57% | 41.33% | -3.54% | -22.11% | 19.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFN and URA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2010 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IFN and URA has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFN vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
IFN
URA
IFN vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The India Fund (IFN) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IFN | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | 1.23 | -2.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | 1.86 | -3.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.22 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 2.17 | -3.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.88 | 4.58 | -6.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFN | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.35 | 1.23 | -2.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.49 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.46 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | -0.05 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
IFN vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFN drawdown since its inception was -71.52%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFN and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFN | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.52% | -93.54% | +22.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.05% | -28.43% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.53% | -37.81% | +6.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.53% | -37.90% | +6.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.48% | -61.45% | +19.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.31% | -42.81% | +13.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.89% | -75.01% | +49.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.78% | 13.40% | -1.62% |
Volatility
IFN vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The India Fund (IFN) is 5.53%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 15.94%. This indicates that IFN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFN | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 15.94% | -10.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.39% | 38.29% | -24.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.41% | 50.19% | -33.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 43.62% | -25.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 37.73% | -18.83% |
IFN vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFN has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFN vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
IFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.07%, more than URA's 4.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFN The India Fund | 20.07% | 16.09% | 14.60% | 8.97% | 21.47% | 15.21% | 9.77% | 11.57% | 22.25% | 12.11% | 7.97% | 8.02% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.14% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFN and URA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (15.94%) compared to IFN (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFN dropped -71.52% vs URA's -93.54%.
URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFN and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer