IFN vs. EAD
IFN (The India Fund) and EAD (Emerging Markets Dividend Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, IFN returned 6.15%/yr vs 7.42%/yr for EAD. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IFN charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for EAD.
Performance
IFN vs. EAD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFN achieves a -14.22% return, which is significantly lower than EAD's 0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, IFN has underperformed EAD with an annualized return of 6.15%, while EAD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.42% annualized return.
IFN
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -5.19%
- YTD
- -14.22%
- 6M
- -16.23%
- 1Y
- -21.15%
- 3Y*
- 1.33%
- 5Y*
- 0.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
EAD
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- 11.49%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.42%
IFN vs. EAD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFN The India Fund | -14.22% | 0.42% | -2.26% | 36.48% | -15.85% | 22.31% | 12.25% | 11.27% | -5.33% | 37.15% |
EAD Emerging Markets Dividend Fund | 0.69% | 8.05% | 15.86% | 11.94% | -23.08% | 21.62% | 6.35% | 27.22% | -6.52% | 7.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFN and EAD is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2003 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFN vs. EAD — Risk / Return Rank
IFN
EAD
IFN vs. EAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The India Fund (IFN) and Emerging Markets Dividend Fund (EAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IFN | EAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | 0.56 | -1.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | 0.89 | -2.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.11 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 0.65 | -1.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.84 | 2.63 | -4.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFN | EAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.30 | 0.56 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.26 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.46 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.35 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
IFN vs. EAD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFN drawdown since its inception was -71.52%, which is greater than EAD's maximum drawdown of -67.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFN and EAD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFN | EAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.52% | -67.37% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.05% | -8.16% | -17.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.53% | -12.65% | -18.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.53% | -29.44% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.48% | -41.54% | +0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.27% | -2.03% | -26.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.88% | -7.15% | -18.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.69% | 2.03% | +9.66% |
Volatility
IFN vs. EAD - Volatility Comparison
The India Fund (IFN) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Emerging Markets Dividend Fund (EAD) at 3.05%. This indicates that IFN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFN | EAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 3.05% | +2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.36% | 7.26% | +6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.36% | 9.25% | +7.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 13.58% | +4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 16.13% | +2.77% |
IFN vs. EAD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFN has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than EAD's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IFN vs. EAD - Dividend Comparison
IFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.78%, more than EAD's 9.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAD Emerging Markets Dividend Fund | 9.79% | 9.47% | 9.08% | 9.07% | 10.97% | 7.59% | 8.51% | 8.44% | 9.11% | 8.58% | 9.62% | 10.95% |
IFN The India Fund | 19.78% | 16.09% | 14.60% | 8.97% | 21.47% | 15.21% | 9.77% | 11.57% | 22.25% | 12.11% | 7.97% | 8.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFN and EAD have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IFN has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to EAD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFN dropped -71.52% vs EAD's -67.37%.
EAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFN and EAD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer