IFN vs. SIVLX
IFN (The India Fund) and SIVLX (Seafarer Overseas Value Fund Institutional Class) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, IFN returned 0.25%/yr vs 9.97%/yr for SIVLX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IFN charges 0.01%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for SIVLX.
Performance
IFN vs. SIVLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFN achieves a -15.46% return, which is significantly lower than SIVLX's 9.13% return.
IFN
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -5.23%
- YTD
- -15.46%
- 6M
- -17.27%
- 1Y
- -22.15%
- 3Y*
- 0.84%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 5.99%
SIVLX
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 9.13%
- 6M
- 9.89%
- 1Y
- 29.21%
- 3Y*
- 15.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.97%
- 10Y*
- —
IFN vs. SIVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFN The India Fund | -15.46% | 0.42% | -2.26% | 36.48% | -15.85% | 22.31% | 12.25% | 11.27% | -5.33% | 38.90% |
SIVLX Seafarer Overseas Value Fund Institutional Class | 9.13% | 37.79% | -3.34% | 13.38% | -0.74% | 10.05% | 4.05% | 21.98% | -13.91% | 23.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFN and SIVLX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFN vs. SIVLX — Risk / Return Rank
IFN
SIVLX
IFN vs. SIVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The India Fund (IFN) and Seafarer Overseas Value Fund Institutional Class (SIVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IFN | SIVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | 2.46 | -3.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | 3.36 | -5.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.49 | -0.71 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 2.37 | -3.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.88 | 7.92 | -9.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFN | SIVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.35 | 2.46 | -3.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.85 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.78 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
IFN vs. SIVLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFN drawdown since its inception was -71.52%, which is greater than SIVLX's maximum drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFN and SIVLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFN | SIVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.52% | -33.09% | -38.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.05% | -12.51% | -13.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.53% | -12.51% | -19.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.53% | -16.39% | -15.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.31% | -5.80% | -23.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.89% | -5.60% | -20.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.78% | 3.73% | +8.05% |
Volatility
IFN vs. SIVLX - Volatility Comparison
The India Fund (IFN) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to Seafarer Overseas Value Fund Institutional Class (SIVLX) at 3.81%. This indicates that IFN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFN | SIVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 3.81% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.39% | 10.37% | +3.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.41% | 12.04% | +4.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 11.75% | +5.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 12.60% | +6.30% |
IFN vs. SIVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFN has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than SIVLX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFN vs. SIVLX - Dividend Comparison
IFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.07%, more than SIVLX's 4.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFN The India Fund | 20.07% | 16.09% | 14.60% | 8.97% | 21.47% | 15.21% | 9.77% | 11.57% | 22.25% | 12.11% | 7.97% | 8.02% |
SIVLX Seafarer Overseas Value Fund Institutional Class | 4.63% | 5.05% | 4.23% | 2.93% | 1.70% | 3.56% | 1.38% | 3.06% | 3.30% | 3.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFN and SIVLX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IFN has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to SIVLX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFN dropped -71.52% vs SIVLX's -33.09%.
SIVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFN and SIVLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer