IFLR vs. WNTR
IFLR (Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFLR is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. IFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.
Performance
IFLR vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 17.65% return.
IFLR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WNTR
- 1D
- 6.51%
- 1M
- 45.64%
- YTD
- 17.65%
- 6M
- 21.49%
- 1Y
- 115.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFLR vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF | 5.52% | 3.03% |
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 17.65% | 18.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFLR and WNTR is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | -0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFLR vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank
IFLR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WNTR
IFLR vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFLR | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.73 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.99 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFLR vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and WNTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFLR | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -42.65% | +33.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -42.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -4.02% | +1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | -20.87% | +18.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.66% | — |
Volatility
IFLR vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFLR | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.52% | 53.16% | -39.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 53.31% | -39.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 53.31% | -39.79% |
IFLR vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFLR vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison
IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than WNTR's 94.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF | 0.28% | 0.00% |
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 94.34% | 58.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFLR and WNTR have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IFLR is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IFLR is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.
WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 94.34%, compared with 0.28% for IFLR.
IFLR is categorized as Global Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for IFLR and 1.01% for WNTR.
Find the right allocation for IFLR and WNTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer