IFLR vs. DFAI
IFLR (Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF) and DFAI (Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFLR is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while DFAI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for DFAI.
Performance
IFLR vs. DFAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly lower than DFAI's 9.26% return.
IFLR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFAI
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- 9.26%
- 6M
- 8.66%
- 1Y
- 24.42%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.63%
- 10Y*
- —
IFLR vs. DFAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF | 5.52% | 3.03% |
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF | 9.26% | 6.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFLR and DFAI is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.90 |
IFLR vs. DFAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFLR
DFAI
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
IFLR
DFAI
Industrials
IFLR
DFAI
Technology
IFLR
DFAI
Healthcare
IFLR
DFAI
Consumer Cyclical
IFLR
DFAI
Consumer Defensive
IFLR
DFAI
Basic Materials
IFLR
DFAI
Communication Services
IFLR
DFAI
Utilities
IFLR
DFAI
Energy
IFLR
DFAI
Real Estate
IFLR
DFAI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFLR vs. DFAI — Risk / Return Rank
IFLR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DFAI
IFLR vs. DFAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFLR | DFAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFLR vs. DFAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum DFAI drawdown of -27.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and DFAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFLR | DFAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -27.44% | +17.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -1.52% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | -5.08% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.81% | — |
Volatility
IFLR vs. DFAI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFLR | DFAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.52% | 14.56% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 15.99% | -2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 15.73% | -2.21% |
IFLR vs. DFAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAI's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFLR vs. DFAI - Dividend Comparison
IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than DFAI's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF | 2.36% | 2.45% | 2.72% | 2.64% | 2.72% | 2.06% | 0.09% |
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, IFLR and DFAI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, DFAI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DFAI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for IFLR.
DFAI has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 0.28% for IFLR.
IFLR is categorized as Global Equities, while DFAI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for IFLR and 0.18% for DFAI.
Find the right allocation for IFLR and DFAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer