PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFLR vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFLR vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.


IFLR

1D
-0.55%
1M
3.67%
YTD
4.93%
6M
7.25%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COMT

1D
0.78%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
39.67%
6M
39.06%
1Y
47.51%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFLR vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IFLR and COMT is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

-0.37

IFLR vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IFLR
COMT

Financial Services

21.1%
100.0%

Industrials

17.4%

-

Technology

11.4%

-

Healthcare

9.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.6%

-

Basic Materials

5.7%

-

Communication Services

3.9%

-

Energy

3.7%

-

Utilities

3.6%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Financial Services

IFLR
21.1%
COMT
100.0%

Industrials

IFLR
17.4%
COMT

-

Technology

IFLR
11.4%
COMT

-

Healthcare

IFLR
9.6%
COMT

-

Consumer Cyclical

IFLR
7.3%
COMT

-

Consumer Defensive

IFLR
6.6%
COMT

-

Basic Materials

IFLR
5.7%
COMT

-

Communication Services

IFLR
3.9%
COMT

-

Energy

IFLR
3.7%
COMT

-

Utilities

IFLR
3.6%
COMT

-

Real Estate

IFLR
1.7%
COMT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFLR vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFLR

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFLR vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IFLR vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFLRCOMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.43

0.20

+1.22

Drawdowns

IFLR vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFLRCOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.58%

-51.89%

+42.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-4.82%

+2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-24.07%

+21.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

Volatility

IFLR vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFLRCOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.07%

21.29%

-8.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.07%

21.06%

-7.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.07%

18.89%

-5.82%

IFLR vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFLR vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than COMT's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
5.54%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
IFLR
Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF
0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFLR and COMT have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for IFLR.

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.28% for IFLR.

IFLR is categorized as Global Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for IFLR and 0.48% for COMT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFLR and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer