IFLO vs. UMMA
IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) and UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, IFLO returned 31.49% vs 38.94% for UMMA. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFLO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UMMA.
Performance
IFLO vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFLO achieves a 18.32% return, which is significantly lower than UMMA's 23.36% return.
IFLO
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- YTD
- 18.32%
- 1Y
- 31.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UMMA
- 1D
- -3.41%
- 1M
- -5.10%
- 6M
- 16.03%
- YTD
- 23.36%
- 1Y
- 38.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFLO vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 18.32% | 13.12% |
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | 23.36% | 14.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFLO and UMMA is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.74 |
The correlation between IFLO and UMMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
IFLO vs. UMMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFLO
UMMA
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Technology
IFLO
UMMA
Industrials
IFLO
UMMA
Consumer Cyclical
IFLO
UMMA
Energy
IFLO
UMMA
Healthcare
IFLO
UMMA
Basic Materials
IFLO
UMMA
Communication Services
IFLO
UMMA
Consumer Defensive
IFLO
UMMA
Financial Services
IFLO
UMMA
Utilities
IFLO
UMMA
-
Real Estate
IFLO
UMMA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFLO vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank
IFLO
UMMA
IFLO vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFLO | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.30 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.91 | 2.62 | +2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.50 | 9.55 | +6.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFLO vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFLO drawdown since its inception was -6.44%, smaller than the maximum UMMA drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLO and UMMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFLO | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -34.17% | +27.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.44% | -14.93% | +8.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.22% | -9.58% | +7.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.29% | -9.68% | +8.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 4.09% | -2.18% |
Volatility
IFLO vs. UMMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) is 4.77%, while Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a volatility of 11.21%. This indicates that IFLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFLO | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 11.21% | -6.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.05% | 21.35% | -9.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.71% | 23.72% | -9.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 21.23% | -6.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 21.23% | -6.62% |
IFLO vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFLO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFLO vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison
IFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than UMMA's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.57% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | 0.99% | 1.02% | 0.91% | 1.09% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFLO and UMMA have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMMA has higher volatility (11.21%) compared to IFLO (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFLO dropped -6.44% vs UMMA's -34.17%.
On 1-year performance, UMMA leads with 38.94% vs 31.49% for IFLO. On fees, IFLO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, IFLO has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UMMA has performed better with a 38.94% return vs 31.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFLO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.
IFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.99% for UMMA.
They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for IFLO and 0.65% for UMMA.
IFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFLO and UMMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer