IFLO vs. UMMA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) and UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFLO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UMMA.

Performance

IFLO vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFLO achieves a 20.27% return, which is significantly lower than UMMA's 32.32% return.

IFLO

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 5.37%
• YTD: 20.27%
• 6M: 21.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UMMA

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 12.11%
• YTD: 32.32%
• 6M: 35.20%
• 1Y: 51.77%
• 3Y*: 22.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFLO vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	20.27%	12.93%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	32.32%	13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IFLO and UMMA is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.77

IFLO vs. UMMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IFLO	UMMA
Industrials	18.9%	13.5%
Technology	18.1%	42.9%
Consumer Cyclical	14.0%	8.1%
Energy	13.6%	2.9%
Healthcare	12.6%	16.6%
Basic Materials	11.6%	9.3%
Communication Services	6.2%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	5.6%
Utilities	1.2%	-
Financial Services	0.9%	-
Real Estate	0.0%	0.5%

Return for Risk

IFLO vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMMA

UMMA Risk / Return Rank: 76
UMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
UMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
UMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 76
UMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
UMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFLO vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IFLO	UMMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.74	0.58	+2.16

Drawdowns

IFLO vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFLO drawdown since its inception was -6.44%, smaller than the maximum UMMA drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLO and UMMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	IFLO	UMMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.44%	-34.17%	+27.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.90%	+0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.21%	-9.81%	+8.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IFLO	UMMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.54%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.26%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.15%	20.11%	-5.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.15%	20.55%	-6.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.15%	20.55%	-6.40%

IFLO vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFLO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

IFLO vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison

IFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than UMMA's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	1.02%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	0.93%	1.02%	0.91%	1.09%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IFLO and UMMA in my portfolio?

IFLO and UMMA have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IFLO or UMMA?

On fees, IFLO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IFLO or UMMA?

IFLO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IFLO or UMMA?

IFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.93% for UMMA.

What is the main difference between IFLO and UMMA?

They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for IFLO and 0.65% for UMMA.