IFLO vs. QQQN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFLO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Victory International Free Cash Flow Index, while QQQN is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Q-50 Index. Both are passively managed. IFLO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

IFLO vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IFLO

• 1D: -1.73%
• 1M: 3.06%
• 6M: 17.38%
• YTD: 22.59%
• 1Y: 36.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 34.80%

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	$595.85K	$548.57K	$406.06K
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

IFLO vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	17.06%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

IFLO vs. QQQN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IFLO	QQQN
Industrials	17.8%	8.7%
Technology	16.8%	47.3%
Energy	14.4%	-
Basic Materials	13.8%	1.9%
Healthcare	12.7%	19.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	13.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	1.4%
Communication Services	5.3%	5.5%
Financial Services	0.8%	-
Utilities	0.8%	1.6%
Real Estate	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

IFLO vs. QQQN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IFLO

IFLO Risk / Return Rank: 94
IFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
IFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
IFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
IFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
IFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IFLO vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IFLO	QQQN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.73	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.78	—	—

Drawdowns

IFLO vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFLO drawdown since its inception was -6.44%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLO and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	IFLO	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.44%	0.00%	-6.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.73%	0.00%	-1.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	0.00%	-1.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IFLO	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.32%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.41%	0.00%	+14.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.59%	0.00%	+14.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.59%	0.00%	+14.59%

IFLO vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFLO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

IFLO vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

IFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	1.52%	0.73%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, IFLO or QQQN?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IFLO or QQQN?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IFLO or QQQN?

IFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between IFLO and QQQN?

IFLO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QQQN is Mid Cap Growth Equities. IFLO tracks Victory International Free Cash Flow Index, while QQQN tracks Nasdaq Q-50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for IFLO and 0.18% for QQQN.