IFLO vs. KEMX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) and KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFLO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KEMX.

Performance

IFLO vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFLO achieves a 20.27% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 40.51% return.

IFLO

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 5.37%
• YTD: 20.27%
• 6M: 21.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KEMX

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 8.82%
• YTD: 40.51%
• 6M: 46.50%
• 1Y: 75.91%
• 3Y*: 29.24%
• 5Y*: 13.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFLO vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	20.27%	12.93%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	40.51%	19.19%

Correlation

The correlation between IFLO and KEMX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.68

IFLO vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IFLO	KEMX
Industrials	18.9%	8.6%
Technology	18.1%	41.2%
Consumer Cyclical	14.0%	5.4%
Energy	13.6%	4.8%
Healthcare	12.6%	1.7%
Basic Materials	11.6%	8.2%
Communication Services	6.2%	3.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	3.0%
Utilities	1.2%	2.0%
Financial Services	0.9%	20.7%
Real Estate	0.0%	1.2%

Return for Risk

IFLO vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMX

KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 90
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFLO vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IFLO	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.74	0.67	+2.07

Drawdowns

IFLO vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFLO drawdown since its inception was -6.44%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLO and KEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IFLO	KEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.44%	-38.80%	+32.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.36%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.62%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.52%	+2.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.21%	-8.85%	+7.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IFLO	KEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.15%	22.44%	-8.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.15%	18.21%	-4.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.15%	20.94%	-6.79%

IFLO vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFLO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

IFLO vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

IFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than KEMX's 2.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	1.02%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	2.33%	3.28%	3.39%	2.00%	4.10%	4.79%	1.69%	2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IFLO and KEMX in my portfolio?

IFLO and KEMX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IFLO or KEMX?

On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IFLO or KEMX?

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IFLO or KEMX?

KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.02% for IFLO.

What is the main difference between IFLO and KEMX?

They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for IFLO and 0.25% for KEMX.