IFGL vs. BLDG
IFGL (iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. IFGL is passively managed, while BLDG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IFGL returned -1.93%/yr vs 3.43%/yr for BLDG. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IFGL charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.
Performance
IFGL vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFGL achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than BLDG's 13.98% return.
IFGL
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- 6M
- -2.69%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 8.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.92%
- 5Y*
- -1.93%
- 10Y*
- 1.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.86%
BLDG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- YTD
- 13.98%
- 1Y
- 17.84%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $91.83K | $83.90K | $581.35K | |
| $243.44K | $230.79K | $223.33K |
IFGL vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | 1.92% | 24.31% | -7.25% | 5.40% | -24.21% | 8.29% | 15.99% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 13.98% | 4.26% | 8.18% | 1.76% | -14.66% | 22.47% | 15.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFGL and BLDG is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020 | 0.70 |
The correlation between IFGL and BLDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFGL vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
IFGL
BLDG
IFGL vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFGL | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.26 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 1.71 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.47 | 6.03 | -4.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFGL vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFGL drawdown since its inception was -68.93%, which is greater than BLDG's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFGL and BLDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFGL | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.93% | -27.25% | -41.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.38% | -10.08% | -4.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.77% | -18.57% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.00% | -27.25% | -10.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.37% | -1.92% | -9.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.28% | -8.99% | -8.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.18% | 2.85% | +3.33% |
Volatility
IFGL vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) have volatilities of 3.67% and 3.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFGL | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 3.77% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.21% | 9.59% | +2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.13% | 11.52% | +2.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.39% | 15.23% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 15.50% | +0.91% |
IFGL vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFGL has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFGL vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
IFGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, less than BLDG's 5.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.15% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | 4.03% | 3.71% | 4.83% | 1.82% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 2.17% | 7.60% | 4.10% | 4.90% | 7.68% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFGL and BLDG have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLDG has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to IFGL (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFGL dropped -68.93% vs BLDG's -27.25%.
On 5-year performance, BLDG leads with 3.43% vs -1.93% for IFGL. On fees, IFGL is cheaper at 0.48% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BLDG has performed better with a 3.43% return vs -1.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFGL is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BLDG.
BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 4.03% for IFGL.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for IFGL and 0.59% for BLDG.
BLDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFGL and BLDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer