IFGL vs. BLDG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG).
IFGL and BLDG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IFGL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2007. BLDG is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Sep 24, 2020.
Performance
IFGL vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IFGL vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | -1.32% | 24.31% | -7.25% | 5.40% | -24.21% | 8.29% | 15.37% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | -0.71% | 4.26% | 8.18% | 1.76% | -14.66% | 22.47% | 15.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFGL achieves a -1.32% return, which is significantly lower than BLDG's -0.71% return.
IFGL
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -9.07%
- YTD
- -1.32%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- 18.49%
- 3Y*
- 6.80%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 1.80%
BLDG
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -7.55%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -4.12%
- 1Y
- 6.29%
- 3Y*
- 5.76%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IFGL vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFGL has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IFGL vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
IFGL
BLDG
IFGL vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IFGL | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 0.47 | +0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 0.73 | +1.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.10 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 0.58 | +0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.78 | 2.11 | +3.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFGL | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 0.47 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.15 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.38 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between IFGL and BLDG is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IFGL vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
IFGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than BLDG's 6.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | 3.86% | 3.71% | 4.83% | 1.82% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 2.17% | 7.60% | 4.10% | 4.90% | 7.68% | 3.70% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 6.11% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IFGL vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFGL drawdown since its inception was -67.94%, which is greater than BLDG's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFGL and BLDG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFGL | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.94% | -27.25% | -40.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.38% | -10.80% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.47% | -27.25% | -11.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.18% | -8.75% | -5.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.72% | -9.44% | -7.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 2.98% | +0.37% |
Volatility
IFGL vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) at 4.17%. This indicates that IFGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IFGL | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.38% | 4.17% | +2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 7.34% | +2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.45% | 13.30% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 15.22% | +0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 15.60% | +0.89% |