IFGL vs. REET
IFGL (iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF) and REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) are both REIT funds from iShares - IFGL tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index while REET tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IFGL returned 1.88%/yr vs 4.29%/yr for REET. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFGL charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for REET.
Performance
IFGL vs. REET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFGL achieves a -2.59% return, which is significantly lower than REET's 10.82% return. Over the past 10 years, IFGL has underperformed REET with an annualized return of 1.88%, while REET has yielded a comparatively higher 4.29% annualized return.
IFGL
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- -2.59%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 8.32%
- 5Y*
- -2.62%
- 10Y*
- 1.88%
REET
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 11.49%
- 1Y
- 14.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.71%
- 10Y*
- 4.29%
IFGL vs. REET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | -2.59% | 24.31% | -7.25% | 5.40% | -24.21% | 8.29% | -7.62% | 20.65% | -6.39% | 20.00% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 10.82% | 7.97% | 2.65% | 10.28% | -24.10% | 32.43% | -10.48% | 24.42% | -5.27% | 7.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFGL and REET is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2014 | 0.71 |
The correlation between IFGL and REET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFGL vs. REET — Risk / Return Rank
IFGL
REET
IFGL vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFGL | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.21 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 1.61 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.63 | 5.76 | -5.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFGL vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFGL drawdown since its inception was -68.93%, which is greater than REET's maximum drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFGL and REET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFGL | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.93% | -44.59% | -24.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.38% | -9.04% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.77% | -18.02% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.00% | -32.11% | -5.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.38% | -44.59% | +4.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.30% | -1.42% | -13.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.31% | -9.75% | -7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.27% | 2.52% | +2.75% |
Volatility
IFGL vs. REET - Volatility Comparison
iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) have volatilities of 4.17% and 4.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFGL | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 4.30% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.84% | 9.37% | +2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.95% | 12.52% | +1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 16.97% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 18.87% | -2.29% |
IFGL vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFGL has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than REET's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFGL vs. REET - Dividend Comparison
IFGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than REET's 3.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | 4.22% | 3.71% | 4.83% | 1.82% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 2.17% | 7.60% | 4.10% | 4.90% | 7.68% | 3.70% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.40% | 3.67% | 3.64% | 3.27% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 2.65% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFGL and REET have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REET has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to IFGL (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFGL dropped -68.93% vs REET's -44.59%.
On 10-year performance, REET leads with 4.29% vs 1.88% for IFGL. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, IFGL has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, REET has performed better with a 4.29% return vs 1.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for IFGL.
IFGL has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 3.40% for REET.
IFGL tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index, while REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for IFGL and 0.14% for REET.
REET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFGL and REET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer