PortfoliosLab logo
IFGL vs. REET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IFGL and REET is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

IFGL vs. REET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IFGL:

0.39

REET:

0.65

Sortino Ratio

IFGL:

0.67

REET:

1.07

Omega Ratio

IFGL:

1.08

REET:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

IFGL:

0.20

REET:

0.54

Martin Ratio

IFGL:

0.66

REET:

1.96

Ulcer Index

IFGL:

9.69%

REET:

6.07%

Daily Std Dev

IFGL:

15.97%

REET:

16.60%

Max Drawdown

IFGL:

-70.14%

REET:

-44.59%

Current Drawdown

IFGL:

-21.97%

REET:

-11.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFGL achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly higher than REET's 3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, IFGL has underperformed REET with an annualized return of 0.02%, while REET has yielded a comparatively higher 3.26% annualized return.


IFGL

YTD

11.54%

1M

7.64%

6M

5.29%

1Y

6.23%

5Y*

2.61%

10Y*

0.02%

REET

YTD

3.11%

1M

8.09%

6M

-2.67%

1Y

10.69%

5Y*

9.19%

10Y*

3.26%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IFGL vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFGL has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than REET's 0.14% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IFGL vs. REET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFGL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IFGL is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IFGL is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IFGL is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IFGL is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IFGL is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IFGL is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

REET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of REET is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of REET is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of REET is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of REET is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of REET is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of REET is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IFGL vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IFGL Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the REET Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFGL and REET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

IFGL vs. REET - Dividend Comparison

IFGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than REET's 3.51% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IFGL
iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF
4.30%4.83%1.82%2.79%3.25%2.17%7.60%4.10%4.90%7.68%3.70%3.56%
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
3.51%3.63%3.27%2.42%3.18%2.64%5.25%5.73%3.84%4.27%3.56%2.12%

Drawdowns

IFGL vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFGL drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, which is greater than REET's maximum drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFGL and REET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

IFGL vs. REET - Volatility Comparison

iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) at 3.91%. This indicates that IFGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...