IFGL vs. REET
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET).
IFGL and REET are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IFGL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2007. REET is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. It was launched on Jul 8, 2014. Both IFGL and REET are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IFGL or REET.
Key characteristics
| IFGL | REET | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -3.45% | 7.19% |
| 1Y Return | 11.51% | 25.91% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -8.80% | -2.02% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -4.14% | 1.49% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -0.06% | 3.92% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.68 | 1.61 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.08 | 2.37 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.13 | 1.29 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.31 | 0.87 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.24 | 6.08 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.85% | 4.11% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.99% | 15.51% |
| Max Drawdown | -70.14% | -44.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -27.18% | -10.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFGL and REET is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IFGL vs. REET - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IFGL achieves a -3.45% return, which is significantly lower than REET's 7.19% return. Over the past 10 years, IFGL has underperformed REET with an annualized return of -0.06%, while REET has yielded a comparatively higher 3.92% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IFGL vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFGL has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than REET's 0.14% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IFGL vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IFGL vs. REET - Dividend Comparison
IFGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than REET's 2.74% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | 3.55% | 1.82% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 2.17% | 7.60% | 4.10% | 4.90% | 7.68% | 3.70% | 3.56% | 11.68% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 2.74% | 3.27% | 2.42% | 3.18% | 2.64% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% | 2.12% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IFGL vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFGL drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, which is greater than REET's maximum drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFGL and REET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IFGL vs. REET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) is 3.98%, while iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that IFGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.