IFGL vs. RWX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX).
IFGL and RWX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IFGL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2007. RWX is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Global ex-U.S. Real Estate Securities Index. It was launched on Dec 15, 2006. Both IFGL and RWX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IFGL or RWX.
Key characteristics
| IFGL | RWX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -5.75% | -8.29% |
| 1Y Return | -0.28% | -3.66% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -8.57% | -7.81% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -3.93% | -3.79% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -0.07% | -0.67% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.14 | -0.33 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.83% | 15.43% |
| Max Drawdown | -70.14% | -73.57% |
| Current Drawdown | -28.91% | -27.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFGL and RWX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IFGL vs. RWX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IFGL achieves a -5.75% return, which is significantly higher than RWX's -8.29% return. Over the past 10 years, IFGL has outperformed RWX with an annualized return of -0.07%, while RWX has yielded a comparatively lower -0.67% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IFGL vs. RWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFGL has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than RWX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IFGL vs. RWX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IFGL vs. RWX - Dividend Comparison
IFGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than RWX's 4.12% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | 2.49% | 1.82% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 2.17% | 7.60% | 4.10% | 4.90% | 7.68% | 3.70% | 3.56% | 11.68% |
RWX SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF | 4.12% | 3.90% | 4.05% | 4.62% | 2.92% | 8.94% | 5.28% | 2.77% | 8.74% | 2.94% | 3.43% | 4.54% |
Drawdowns
IFGL vs. RWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFGL drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, roughly equal to the maximum RWX drawdown of -73.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFGL and RWX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IFGL vs. RWX - Volatility Comparison
iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) have volatilities of 4.94% and 4.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.