PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFEB vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFEB vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFEB achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's 19.07% return.


IFEB

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.98%
YTD
2.84%
6M
3.95%
1Y
10.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY

1D
-0.36%
1M
9.64%
YTD
19.07%
6M
19.11%
1Y
36.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFEB vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IFEB and QQQY is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024

0.57

The correlation between IFEB and QQQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFEB vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFEB
IFEB Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFEB vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IFEBQQQYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.49

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

3.28

-1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.51

13.95

-7.45

IFEB vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFEB and QQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFEBQQQYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.68

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

1.25

-0.20

Drawdowns

IFEB vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFEB drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, smaller than the maximum QQQY drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFEB and QQQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFEBQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-19.05%

+10.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-11.14%

+4.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.36%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.68%

-2.91%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

2.61%

-1.03%

Volatility

IFEB vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) is 2.58%, while Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that IFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFEBQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

4.21%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.52%

11.30%

-4.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.55%

13.67%

-6.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.09%

14.75%

-5.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.09%

14.75%

-5.66%

IFEB vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFEB vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

IFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.34%.


PositionTTM202520242023
IFEB
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
34.34%45.34%83.34%20.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFEB and QQQY have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQY has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to IFEB (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFEB dropped -8.84% vs QQQY's -19.05%.

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 36.38% vs 10.26% for IFEB. On fees, IFEB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, IFEB has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 36.38% return vs 10.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFEB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for QQQY.

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 34.34%, compared with 0.00% for IFEB.

IFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IFEB and 0.99% for QQQY.

QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFEB and QQQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer