IFEB vs. TLTW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IFEB (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February) and TLTW (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF) are both Options Trading funds. IFEB is actively managed, while TLTW is passively managed. Over the past year, IFEB returned 10.26% vs 10.46% for TLTW. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IFEB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for TLTW.

Performance

IFEB vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFEB achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly higher than TLTW's 1.21% return.

IFEB

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 1.98%
• YTD: 2.84%
• 6M: 3.95%
• 1Y: 10.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TLTW

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 1.21%
• 6M: -0.20%
• 1Y: 10.46%
• 3Y*: 0.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFEB vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IFEB Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February	2.84%	19.46%	0.54%
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF	1.21%	11.36%	-1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IFEB and TLTW is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024	0.31

Return for Risk

IFEB vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFEB

IFEB Risk / Return Rank: 39
IFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
IFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
IFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 45
IFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
IFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 41

TLTW

TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 36
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 35
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFEB vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IFEB	TLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.37	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	1.96	+0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.24	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	1.76	-0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.51	5.28	+1.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IFEB vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFEB and TLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IFEB	TLTW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	1.37	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	-0.03	+1.08

Drawdowns

IFEB vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFEB drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, smaller than the maximum TLTW drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFEB and TLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	IFEB	TLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.84%	-18.61%	+9.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-5.97%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-3.20%	+2.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.68%	-8.25%	+6.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	1.99%	-0.41%

Volatility

IFEB vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) have volatilities of 2.58% and 2.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IFEB	TLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.58%	2.48%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.52%	5.79%	+0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.55%	7.70%	-0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.09%	11.39%	-2.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.09%	11.39%	-2.30%

IFEB vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IFEB vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

IFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.76%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IFEB Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF	11.76%	14.82%	14.47%	19.59%	8.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IFEB and TLTW in my portfolio?

IFEB and TLTW have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IFEB or TLTW?

IFEB has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to TLTW (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFEB dropped -8.84% vs TLTW's -18.61%.

Which ETF is better, IFEB or TLTW?

On 1-year performance, TLTW leads with 10.46% vs 10.26% for IFEB. On fees, TLTW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TLTW has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IFEB or TLTW?

Over the 1-year period, TLTW has performed better with a 10.46% return vs 10.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IFEB or TLTW?

TLTW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IFEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IFEB or TLTW?

TLTW has the higher dividend yield at 11.76%, compared with 0.00% for IFEB.

What is the main difference between IFEB and TLTW?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IFEB and 0.35% for TLTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.