PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFEB vs. IVVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFEB vs. IVVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFEB achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly lower than IVVB's 3.81% return.


IFEB

1D
-1.13%
1M
0.03%
YTD
2.70%
6M
2.70%
1Y
10.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVVB

1D
-0.46%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
3.81%
6M
2.94%
1Y
12.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFEB vs. IVVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IFEB and IVVB is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024

0.64

The correlation between IFEB and IVVB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFEB vs. IVVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFEB
IFEB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

IVVB
IVVB Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IVVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVB Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFEB vs. IVVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IFEBIVVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.32

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

2.22

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.44

9.43

-2.99

IFEB vs. IVVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the IVVB Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFEB and IVVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFEB vs. IVVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFEB drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, smaller than the maximum IVVB drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFEB and IVVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFEBIVVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-13.08%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-5.75%

-0.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-0.88%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-1.59%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

1.35%

+0.23%

Volatility

IFEB vs. IVVB - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) at 1.74%. This indicates that IFEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFEBIVVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

1.74%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.99%

5.49%

+1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.86%

7.40%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.14%

9.25%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.14%

9.25%

-0.11%

IFEB vs. IVVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVB's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFEB vs. IVVB - Dividend Comparison

IFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IFEB and IVVB have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFEB has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to IVVB (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFEB dropped -8.84% vs IVVB's -13.08%.

On 1-year performance, IVVB leads with 12.68% vs 10.17% for IFEB. On fees, IVVB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IVVB has been the lower-risk option at 1.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IVVB has performed better with a 12.68% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVVB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IFEB.

IVVB has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.00% for IFEB.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IFEB and 0.50% for IVVB.

IVVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFEB and IVVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer