IFEB vs. BUFF
IFEB (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February) and BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFEB is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while BUFF is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. IFEB is actively managed, while BUFF is passively managed. Over the past year, IFEB returned 10.26% vs 14.36% for BUFF. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFEB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for BUFF.
Performance
IFEB vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFEB achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than BUFF's 5.42% return.
IFEB
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 2.84%
- 6M
- 3.95%
- 1Y
- 10.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFF
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- —
IFEB vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IFEB Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February | 2.84% | 19.46% | 0.54% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 5.42% | 11.02% | 10.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFEB and BUFF is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024 | 0.64 |
The correlation between IFEB and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
IFEB vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFEB
BUFF
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IFEB
BUFF
Industrials
IFEB
BUFF
Healthcare
IFEB
BUFF
Technology
IFEB
BUFF
Consumer Cyclical
IFEB
BUFF
Consumer Defensive
IFEB
BUFF
Basic Materials
IFEB
BUFF
Communication Services
IFEB
BUFF
Energy
IFEB
BUFF
Utilities
IFEB
BUFF
Real Estate
IFEB
BUFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFEB vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank
IFEB
BUFF
IFEB vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IFEB | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.58 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 4.02 | -2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.51 | 21.50 | -14.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFEB | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 2.80 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.49 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
IFEB vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFEB drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFEB and BUFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFEB | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -46.23% | +37.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -3.58% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -0.27% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.68% | -6.18% | +4.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 0.67% | +0.91% |
Volatility
IFEB vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) has a higher volatility of 2.58% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 1.02%. This indicates that IFEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFEB | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.58% | 1.02% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.52% | 3.83% | +2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.55% | 5.15% | +2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.09% | 8.41% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.09% | 17.67% | -8.58% |
IFEB vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFEB vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison
Neither IFEB nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.55% | 0.18% |
IFEB Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFEB and BUFF have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IFEB has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFEB dropped -8.84% vs BUFF's -46.23%.
On 1-year performance, BUFF leads with 14.36% vs 10.26% for IFEB. On fees, IFEB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BUFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BUFF has performed better with a 14.36% return vs 10.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFEB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.
IFEB and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
IFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while BUFF is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IFEB and 0.89% for BUFF.
BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFEB and BUFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer