IFEB vs. IBIC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IFEB (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFEB is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. IFEB is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. Over the past year, IFEB returned 10.17% vs 4.42% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. IFEB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

IFEB vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFEB achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.43% return.

IFEB

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 2.70%
• 1Y: 10.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIC

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 2.43%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 4.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFEB vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IFEB Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February	2.70%	19.46%	0.98%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.43%	4.96%	4.77%

Correlation

The correlation between IFEB and IBIC is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	-0.01

The correlation between IFEB and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IFEB vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFEB

IFEB Risk / Return Rank: 40
IFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
IFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
IFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 45
IFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
IFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 43

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFEB vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IFEB	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	4.99	-3.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	8.97	-7.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	2.22	-0.95
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	16.56	-14.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.44	58.67	-52.24

IFEB vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFEB and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IFEB vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFEB drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFEB and IBIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	IFEB	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.84%	-0.90%	-7.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-0.27%	-6.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.13%	-0.08%	-1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-0.10%	-1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	0.08%	+1.50%

Volatility

IFEB vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that IFEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IFEB	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.75%	0.17%	+2.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.99%	0.67%	+6.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.86%	0.89%	+6.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.14%	1.56%	+7.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.14%	1.56%	+7.58%

IFEB vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

IFEB vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

IFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	3.58%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%
IFEB Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IFEB and IBIC in my portfolio?

IFEB and IBIC have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IFEB or IBIC?

IFEB has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFEB dropped -8.84% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

Which ETF is better, IFEB or IBIC?

On 1-year performance, IFEB leads with 10.17% vs 4.42% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IFEB or IBIC?

Over the 1-year period, IFEB has performed better with a 10.17% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IFEB or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IFEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IFEB or IBIC?

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.00% for IFEB.

What is the main difference between IFEB and IBIC?

IFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IFEB and 0.10% for IBIC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.