PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFEB vs. BAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IFEB vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IFEB vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFEB achieves a -1.37% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 2.08% return.


IFEB

1D
1.83%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
-1.37%
6M
1.47%
1Y
11.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAPR

1D
2.58%
1M
0.99%
YTD
2.08%
6M
4.42%
1Y
15.33%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IFEB vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IFEB vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFEB
IFEB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BAPR
BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFEB vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IFEBBAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

1.29

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

1.99

-0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.40

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.74

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.65

11.59

-4.94

IFEB vs. BAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the BAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFEB and BAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFEBBAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

1.29

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.75

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between IFEB and BAPR is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IFEB vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither IFEB nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IFEB vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFEB drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFEB and BAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IFEBBAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-23.91%

+15.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-9.19%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.48%

0.00%

-4.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-2.66%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.38%

+0.22%

Volatility

IFEB vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) at 3.45%. This indicates that IFEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IFEBBAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

3.45%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.46%

4.26%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.29%

11.90%

-2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.00%

11.54%

-2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.00%

13.25%

-4.25%