PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFEB vs. HEQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFEB vs. HEQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFEB achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly lower than HEQT's 5.74% return.


IFEB

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.00%
6M
3.90%
YTD
4.84%
1Y
11.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.87%

HEQT

1D
0.48%
1M
0.62%
6M
4.44%
YTD
5.74%
1Y
12.81%
3Y*
12.64%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.71M$2.08M$1.80M
$236.38K$418.05K$331.11K

IFEB vs. HEQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IFEB
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February
4.84%19.46%0.98%
HEQT
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF
5.74%10.08%17.23%

Correlation

The correlation between IFEB and HEQT is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024

0.64

The correlation between IFEB and HEQT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFEB vs. HEQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IFEB
IFEB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

HEQT
HEQT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HEQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEQT Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HEQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEQT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IFEB vs. HEQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IFEBHEQTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.37

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.42

10.53

-3.11

IFEB vs. HEQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the HEQT Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFEB and HEQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFEB vs. HEQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFEB drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, smaller than the maximum HEQT drawdown of -11.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFEB and HEQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFEBHEQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-11.51%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-5.09%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.33%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-2.71%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

1.15%

+0.43%

Volatility

IFEB vs. HEQT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) at 2.18%. This indicates that IFEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFEBHEQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

2.18%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

5.69%

+1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.98%

6.95%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.07%

8.44%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.07%

8.44%

+0.63%

IFEB vs. HEQT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HEQT's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFEB vs. HEQT - Dividend Comparison

IFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HEQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HEQT
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF
1.19%1.19%1.29%4.10%3.94%0.27%
IFEB
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFEB and HEQT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFEB has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to HEQT (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFEB dropped -8.84% vs HEQT's -11.51%.

On 1-year performance, HEQT leads with 12.81% vs 11.77% for IFEB. On fees, HEQT is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, HEQT has been the lower-risk option at 2.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HEQT has performed better with a 12.81% return vs 11.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HEQT is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IFEB.

HEQT has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.00% for IFEB.

IFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while HEQT is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IFEB and 0.43% for HEQT.

HEQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFEB and HEQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer