PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEZ vs. PXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEZ vs. PXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEZ achieves a 35.92% return, which is significantly lower than PXJ's 47.13% return. Over the past 10 years, IEZ has underperformed PXJ with an annualized return of -1.17%, while PXJ has yielded a comparatively higher -0.28% annualized return.


IEZ

1D
2.54%
1M
9.13%
6M
8.39%
YTD
35.92%
1Y
63.51%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
18.66%
10Y*
-1.17%
ALL TIME*
-1.80%

PXJ

1D
1.19%
1M
10.57%
6M
18.80%
YTD
47.13%
1Y
76.71%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
24.53%
10Y*
-0.28%
ALL TIME*
-1.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.10M$5.32M$13.27M
$745.88K$1.19M$1.85M

IEZ vs. PXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEZ
iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF
35.92%7.51%-8.15%4.43%65.73%15.98%-42.98%1.82%-42.47%-18.18%
PXJ
Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF
47.13%8.74%0.21%14.44%62.25%11.28%-44.31%-0.32%-39.82%-23.08%

Correlation

The correlation between IEZ and PXJ is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006

0.97

The correlation between IEZ and PXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEZ vs. PXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEZ
PXJ

Energy

99.1%
74.8%

Utilities

1.0%
2.1%

Industrials

0.9%
14.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

IEZ
99.1%
PXJ
74.8%

Utilities

IEZ
1.0%
PXJ
2.1%

Industrials

IEZ
0.9%
PXJ
14.7%

Basic Materials

IEZ

-

PXJ

-

Communication Services

IEZ

-

PXJ

-

Consumer Cyclical

IEZ

-

PXJ

-

Consumer Defensive

IEZ

-

PXJ

-

Financial Services

IEZ

-

PXJ
0.2%

Healthcare

IEZ

-

PXJ

-

Real Estate

IEZ

-

PXJ

-

Technology

IEZ

-

PXJ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEZ vs. PXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IEZ
IEZ Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PXJ
PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IEZ vs. PXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEZPXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.46

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

4.19

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.47

13.72

-4.25

IEZ vs. PXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the PXJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEZ and PXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEZ vs. PXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEZ drawdown since its inception was -92.52%, roughly equal to the maximum PXJ drawdown of -94.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEZ and PXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEZPXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.52%

-94.82%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.34%

-18.39%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.25%

-40.03%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.25%

-40.03%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.29%

-87.72%

-0.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.14%

-66.38%

+11.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.31%

-55.76%

+7.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.73%

5.61%

+1.12%

Volatility

IEZ vs. PXJ - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) at 7.37%. This indicates that IEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEZPXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.13%

7.37%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.82%

19.25%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.61%

26.02%

+2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.87%

34.04%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.46%

39.16%

+2.30%

IEZ vs. PXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEZ has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than PXJ's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEZ vs. PXJ - Dividend Comparison

IEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than PXJ's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEZ
iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF
1.22%1.87%1.76%0.97%0.65%1.20%2.07%2.28%1.81%3.42%0.91%2.40%
PXJ
Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF
2.37%2.91%3.34%1.99%0.65%2.40%4.72%1.87%0.99%2.75%1.18%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IEZ and PXJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IEZ has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to PXJ (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEZ dropped -92.52% vs PXJ's -94.82%.

On 10-year performance, PXJ leads with -0.28% vs -1.17% for IEZ. On fees, IEZ is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, PXJ has been the lower-risk option at 7.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXJ has performed better with a -0.28% return vs -1.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEZ is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXJ.

PXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.22% for IEZ.

IEZ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Equipment & Services Index, while PXJ tracks Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IEZ and 0.63% for PXJ.

PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEZ and PXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer