PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEZ vs. XOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEZ vs. XOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEZ achieves a 47.79% return, which is significantly higher than XOP's 34.27% return. Over the past 10 years, IEZ has underperformed XOP with an annualized return of -0.14%, while XOP has yielded a comparatively higher 3.66% annualized return.


IEZ

1D
2.36%
1M
-3.90%
YTD
47.79%
6M
47.74%
1Y
90.56%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
14.05%
10Y*
-0.14%

XOP

1D
0.58%
1M
-4.43%
YTD
34.27%
6M
28.35%
1Y
42.75%
3Y*
13.59%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
3.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEZ vs. XOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEZ
iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF
47.79%7.51%-8.15%4.43%65.73%15.98%-42.98%1.82%-42.47%-18.18%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
34.27%-2.15%-1.00%3.56%45.37%66.74%-36.40%-9.44%-28.10%-9.47%

Correlation

The correlation between IEZ and XOP is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between IEZ and XOP has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IEZ vs. XOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEZ
XOP

Energy

98.8%
97.2%

Utilities

1.0%

-

Industrials

0.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

2.9%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

IEZ
98.8%
XOP
97.2%

Utilities

IEZ
1.0%
XOP

-

Industrials

IEZ
0.6%
XOP

-

Basic Materials

IEZ

-

XOP
2.9%

Communication Services

IEZ

-

XOP

-

Consumer Cyclical

IEZ

-

XOP

-

Consumer Defensive

IEZ

-

XOP

-

Financial Services

IEZ

-

XOP

-

Healthcare

IEZ

-

XOP

-

Real Estate

IEZ

-

XOP

-

Technology

IEZ

-

XOP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEZ vs. XOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEZ
IEZ Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

XOP
XOP Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOP Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
XOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOP Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEZ vs. XOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEZXOPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.18

1.55

+1.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.88

2.03

+1.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.25

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.02

2.95

+6.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.71

7.60

+17.11

IEZ vs. XOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEZ Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is higher than the XOP Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEZ and XOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEZXOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

1.55

+1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.43

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

0.09

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.06

-0.10

Drawdowns

IEZ vs. XOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEZ drawdown since its inception was -92.52%, roughly equal to the maximum XOP drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEZ and XOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEZXOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.52%

-90.27%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-15.14%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.25%

-34.98%

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.25%

-34.98%

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.29%

-82.61%

-5.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.22%

-37.24%

-13.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.26%

-42.59%

-5.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

5.87%

-2.11%

Volatility

IEZ vs. XOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) is 7.95%, while SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) has a volatility of 10.26%. This indicates that IEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEZXOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

10.26%

-2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.12%

21.61%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.64%

27.80%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.35%

33.88%

+2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.57%

40.29%

+1.28%

IEZ vs. XOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEZ has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XOP's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEZ vs. XOP - Dividend Comparison

IEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than XOP's 1.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEZ
iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF
1.18%1.87%1.76%0.97%0.65%1.20%2.07%2.28%1.81%3.42%0.91%2.40%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
1.93%2.62%2.45%2.63%2.47%1.61%2.34%1.47%0.99%0.76%0.76%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEZ and XOP have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOP has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to IEZ (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEZ dropped -92.52% vs XOP's -90.27%.

On 10-year performance, XOP leads with 3.66% vs -0.14% for IEZ. On fees, XOP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IEZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XOP has performed better with a 3.66% return vs -0.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IEZ.

XOP has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.18% for IEZ.

IEZ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Equipment & Services Index, while XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IEZ and 0.35% for XOP.

IEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEZ and XOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer