IEZ vs. POW

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

IEZ (iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEZ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Equipment & Services Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. IEZ is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IEZ charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

IEZ vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEZ achieves a 33.37% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 41.57% return.

IEZ

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -9.29%
• 6M: 19.36%
• YTD: 33.37%
• 1Y: 56.95%
• 3Y*: 9.02%
• 5Y*: 16.63%
• 10Y*: -1.66%

POW

• 1D: 1.90%
• 1M: -7.03%
• 6M: 34.18%
• YTD: 41.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEZ vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IEZ iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF	33.37%	4.14%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	41.57%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between IEZ and POW is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

IEZ vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEZ

IEZ Risk / Return Rank: 72
IEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
IEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
IEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
IEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
IEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 69

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEZ vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IEZ	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.82	—	—

Drawdowns

IEZ vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEZ drawdown since its inception was -92.52%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEZ and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	IEZ	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.52%	-18.37%	-74.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.98%	-16.82%	-39.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.29%	-4.40%	-43.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.84%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IEZ	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.82%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.73%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.34%	32.91%	-3.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.14%	32.91%	+3.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.45%	32.91%	+8.54%

IEZ vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEZ has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

IEZ vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

IEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IEZ iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF	1.24%	1.87%	1.76%	0.97%	0.65%	1.20%	2.07%	2.28%	1.81%	3.42%	0.91%	2.40%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IEZ and POW in my portfolio?

IEZ and POW have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IEZ or POW?

On fees, IEZ is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IEZ or POW?

IEZ is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IEZ or POW?

IEZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between IEZ and POW?

IEZ is categorized as Energy Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IEZ and 0.75% for POW.