IEVAX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Global Value Fund (IEVAX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
IEVAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Mar 19, 1995. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
IEVAX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IEVAX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEVAX Columbia Global Value Fund | -0.80% | 21.42% | 11.78% | 12.00% | -8.52% | 20.31% | 3.77% | 24.55% | -12.22% | 21.93% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEVAX achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, IEVAX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 9.58%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.
IEVAX
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- -0.80%
- 6M
- 3.01%
- 1Y
- 18.16%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IEVAX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEVAX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IEVAX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
IEVAX
FGIAX
IEVAX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Global Value Fund (IEVAX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEVAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.22 | 1.79 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 2.30 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.36 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 2.73 | -1.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.26 | 12.62 | -5.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEVAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.79 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.80 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.42 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between IEVAX and FGIAX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IEVAX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
IEVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.80%, more than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEVAX Columbia Global Value Fund | 10.80% | 10.06% | 10.32% | 6.26% | 7.61% | 11.24% | 8.76% | 9.16% | 6.75% | 1.66% | 2.28% | 4.68% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
IEVAX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEVAX drawdown since its inception was -56.85%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEVAX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEVAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.85% | -49.35% | -7.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.17% | -8.29% | -3.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.58% | -21.08% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.88% | -38.02% | +0.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.32% | -3.06% | -3.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | -7.22% | -1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 1.79% | +0.76% |
Volatility
IEVAX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Global Value Fund (IEVAX) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that IEVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IEVAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 4.15% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.11% | 7.07% | +1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.91% | 12.28% | +2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.06% | 13.08% | +0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 15.17% | +1.42% |