PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IETH vs. RYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IETH vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF (IETH) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IETH achieves a -32.43% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 13.48% return.


IETH

1D
0.43%
1M
7.22%
6M
-14.64%
YTD
-32.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

RYLD

1D
1.06%
1M
2.27%
6M
10.40%
YTD
13.48%
1Y
26.26%
3Y*
8.70%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.90K$4.22K$6.65K
$9.87M$9.43M$9.08M

IETH vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IETH and RYLD is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.52

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IETH vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IETH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IETH vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF (IETH) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IETHRYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.17

IETH vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IETH vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IETH drawdown since its inception was -59.76%, which is greater than RYLD's maximum drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IETH and RYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IETHRYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.76%

-41.53%

-18.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.29%

0.00%

-53.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.45%

-8.65%

-31.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

Volatility

IETH vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IETHRYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.92%

10.58%

+47.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.92%

13.98%

+43.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.92%

17.04%

+40.88%

IETH vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IETH has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IETH vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

IETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.82%, more than RYLD's 11.50% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IETH
Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF
46.82%18.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
11.50%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


IETH and RYLD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for IETH.

IETH has the higher dividend yield at 46.82%, compared with 11.50% for RYLD.

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for IETH and 0.60% for RYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IETH and RYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer