IESC vs. TLN
IESC (IES Holdings, Inc.) and TLN (Talen Energy Corporation) are both stocks. IESC operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while TLN operates in Utilities - Independent Power Producers (Utilities). Over the past 3 years, IESC returned 140.27%/yr vs 99.41%/yr for TLN. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IESC vs. TLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IESC achieves a 88.91% return, which is significantly higher than TLN's -2.68% return.
IESC
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- 10.23%
- YTD
- 88.91%
- 6M
- 66.06%
- 1Y
- 162.49%
- 3Y*
- 140.27%
- 5Y*
- 69.06%
- 10Y*
- 48.95%
TLN
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -5.59%
- YTD
- -2.68%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 41.09%
- 3Y*
- 99.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IESC vs. TLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IESC IES Holdings, Inc. | 88.91% | 93.58% | 153.67% | 63.48% |
TLN Talen Energy Corporation | -2.68% | 86.05% | 214.80% | 38.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between IESC and TLN is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2023 | 0.39 |
Fundamentals
IESC:
$14.83B
TLN:
$17.30B
IESC:
$18.85
TLN:
-$0.44
IESC:
4.08
TLN:
5.76
IESC:
13.83
TLN:
16.12
IESC:
$3.63B
TLN:
$3.02B
IESC:
$931.31M
TLN:
$1.06B
IESC:
$487.14M
TLN:
$326.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IESC vs. TLN — Risk / Return Rank
IESC
TLN
IESC vs. TLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Talen Energy Corporation (TLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IESC | TLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.17 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.50 | 1.29 | +6.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.33 | 2.62 | +18.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IESC | TLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 0.73 | +1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 1.98 | -1.93 |
Drawdowns
IESC vs. TLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IESC drawdown since its inception was -98.32%, which is greater than TLN's maximum drawdown of -33.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESC and TLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IESC | TLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.32% | -33.80% | -64.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.80% | -32.05% | +10.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.23% | -33.80% | -15.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -18.18% | +17.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.01% | -7.27% | -47.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.66% | 15.71% | -8.05% |
Volatility
IESC vs. TLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) is 11.77%, while Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that IESC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IESC | TLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.77% | 16.60% | -4.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.79% | 41.46% | +8.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.06% | 56.37% | +5.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.94% | 49.91% | +4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.10% | 49.91% | -1.81% |
Dividends
IESC vs. TLN - Dividend Comparison
Neither IESC nor TLN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
IESC vs. TLN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IES Holdings, Inc. and Talen Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IESC vs. TLN - Profitability Comparison
IESC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.
TLN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Talen Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
IESC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
TLN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Talen Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 210.00M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
IESC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.
TLN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Talen Energy Corporation reported a net income of 63.00M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IESC and TLN have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLN has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to IESC (11.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IESC dropped -98.32% vs TLN's -33.80%.
IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IESC and TLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer