IESC vs. SFM
IESC (IES Holdings, Inc.) and SFM (Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.) are both stocks. IESC operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while SFM operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, IESC returned 44.03%/yr vs 11.97%/yr for SFM. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IESC vs. SFM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IESC achieves a 60.94% return, which is significantly higher than SFM's -6.00% return. Over the past 10 years, IESC has outperformed SFM with an annualized return of 44.03%, while SFM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.97% annualized return.
IESC
- 1D
- -5.67%
- 1M
- -16.24%
- 6M
- 35.66%
- YTD
- 60.94%
- 1Y
- 90.69%
- 3Y*
- 122.59%
- 5Y*
- 65.66%
- 10Y*
- 44.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.24%
SFM
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -12.29%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- -6.00%
- 1Y
- -54.45%
- 3Y*
- 24.08%
- 5Y*
- 24.80%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $134.49M | $228.96M | $176.79M | |
| $151.42M | $179.07M | $185.67M |
IESC vs. SFM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IESC IES Holdings, Inc. | 60.94% | 93.58% | 153.67% | 122.72% | -29.76% | 9.99% | 79.42% | 65.02% | -9.86% | -9.92% |
SFM Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | -6.00% | -37.30% | 164.12% | 48.63% | 9.06% | 47.66% | 3.88% | -17.69% | -3.45% | 28.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between IESC and SFM is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013 | 0.14 |
The correlation between IESC and SFM shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.17 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IESC:
$12.47B
SFM:
$7.04B
IESC:
$18.86
SFM:
$5.22
IESC:
33.19
SFM:
14.36
IESC:
0.40
SFM:
0.52
IESC:
3.48
SFM:
0.82
IESC:
11.78
SFM:
4.99
IESC:
$3.63B
SFM:
$8.90B
IESC:
$931.31M
SFM:
$3.41B
IESC:
$487.14M
SFM:
$837.54M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IESC vs. SFM — Risk / Return Rank
IESC
SFM
IESC vs. SFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IESC | SFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.76 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | -0.92 | +5.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.20 | -1.20 | +11.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IESC vs. SFM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IESC drawdown since its inception was -98.32%, which is greater than SFM's maximum drawdown of -72.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESC and SFM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IESC | SFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.32% | -72.88% | -25.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.80% | -59.30% | +37.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.23% | -63.48% | +14.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.22% | -63.48% | +9.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.28% | -63.48% | +9.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.33% | -58.29% | +39.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.80% | -40.41% | -14.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.92% | 46.29% | -37.37% |
Volatility
IESC vs. SFM - Volatility Comparison
IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a higher volatility of 18.77% compared to Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) at 12.12%. This indicates that IESC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IESC | SFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.77% | 12.12% | +6.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.38% | 30.93% | +20.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.03% | 47.05% | +17.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.71% | 39.51% | +15.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.27% | 38.02% | +10.25% |
Dividends
IESC vs. SFM - Dividend Comparison
Neither IESC nor SFM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
IESC vs. SFM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IES Holdings, Inc. and Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IESC vs. SFM - Profitability Comparison
IESC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.
SFM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported a gross profit of 917.28M and revenue of 2.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.
IESC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
SFM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported an operating income of 215.31M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
IESC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.
SFM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported a net income of 163.72M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IESC and SFM have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IESC has higher volatility (18.77%) compared to SFM (12.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IESC dropped -98.32% vs SFM's -72.88%.
IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IESC and SFM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer