IESC vs. JNJ
IESC (IES Holdings, Inc.) and JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) are both stocks. IESC operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while JNJ operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, IESC returned 48.97%/yr vs 10.46%/yr for JNJ. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IESC vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IESC achieves a 92.75% return, which is significantly higher than JNJ's 17.68% return. Over the past 10 years, IESC has outperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 48.97%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.46% annualized return.
IESC
- 1D
- 2.53%
- 1M
- 9.91%
- YTD
- 92.75%
- 6M
- 62.95%
- 1Y
- 186.31%
- 3Y*
- 139.60%
- 5Y*
- 70.53%
- 10Y*
- 48.97%
JNJ
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 6.86%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 15.11%
- 1Y
- 57.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
IESC vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IESC IES Holdings, Inc. | 92.75% | 93.58% | 153.67% | 122.72% | -29.76% | 9.99% | 79.42% | 65.02% | -9.86% | -9.92% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 17.68% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between IESC and JNJ is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 1998 | 0.10 |
The correlation between IESC and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (3 years) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IESC:
$15.14B
JNJ:
$588.98B
IESC:
$18.85
JNJ:
$8.65
IESC:
39.78
JNJ:
27.85
IESC:
0.48
JNJ:
0.93
IESC:
4.17
JNJ:
6.08
IESC:
14.11
JNJ:
7.25
IESC:
$3.63B
JNJ:
$96.36B
IESC:
$931.31M
JNJ:
$66.60B
IESC:
$487.14M
JNJ:
$31.62B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IESC vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank
IESC
JNJ
IESC vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IESC | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.61 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.09 | 5.28 | +2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.98 | 15.52 | +7.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IESC vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IESC drawdown since its inception was -98.32%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESC and JNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IESC | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.32% | -50.67% | -47.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.80% | -10.96% | -10.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.23% | -15.95% | -33.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.22% | -18.41% | -35.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.28% | -27.37% | -26.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.54% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.97% | -11.90% | -43.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.66% | 3.72% | +3.94% |
Volatility
IESC vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a higher volatility of 15.69% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 5.47%. This indicates that IESC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IESC | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.69% | 5.47% | +10.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.65% | 12.16% | +38.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.74% | 16.94% | +45.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.09% | 16.87% | +37.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.19% | 18.48% | +29.71% |
Dividends
IESC vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
IESC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IESC IES Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.18% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
Financials
IESC vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IES Holdings, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IESC vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison
IESC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.
JNJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.
IESC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
JNJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
IESC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.
JNJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IESC and JNJ have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IESC has higher volatility (15.69%) compared to JNJ (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IESC dropped -98.32% vs JNJ's -50.67%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IESC and JNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer